Placeholder Content Image

"Drivers deserve better": Huge win for motorists over parking fines

<p>In a move to stop unsuspecting drivers being hit with unfair parking fines, NSW councils will soon be banned from issuing a fine without a physical ticket. </p> <p>Finance Minister Courtney Houssos will legislate to effectively ban ticketless parking fines after council raked in $155 million in sneaky fines last year.</p> <p>Ms Houssos will introduce legislation later in September, which will require parking rangers to attach an “on-the-spot notification” to a car which gets a fine either in the form of a sticker or a traditional parking ticket.</p> <p>Ticketless parking fines were first introduced under former Premier Gladys Berejiklian in 2020, with councils issuing a whopping 822,310 ticketless parking fines last financial year, up almost 50 per cent from the year before.</p> <p>Ms Houssos said forcing councils to leave a note telling drivers they had been fined, rather than waiting for a fine to come ion the mail weeks later, was a victory for common sense.</p> <p>"No one ever likes to get a parking fine, but the idea you only find out about a fine weeks later doesn’t pass the common sense test,” she said.</p> <p>“Frustration among drivers and community members about the ticketless parking system is high – and that’s fair enough. The ticketless parking fine system was introduced by the previous government without regard for the impact on drivers and families,” she said.</p> <p>NSW Premier Chris Minns also backed the move, saying, “Drivers deserve better than the current system."</p> <p>In certain limited circumstances, rangers will be able to issue a fine without leaving a ticket, but only if they install new-warning signs, which could include areas where there is no phone reception, like national parks, or in timed enclosed car parks.</p> <p>NRMA Spokesman Peter Khoury said the government’s changes will rebuild public confidence, saying, “Ticketless parking fines removed transparency and made it almost impossible for motorists to contest their fine if they felt they had a legitimate case.”</p> <p><em>Image credits: Shutterstock </em></p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

Aussie motorist's act of defiance against parking fees

<p>Aussie drivers have been warned against replicating a cheeky way a motorist tried to pay for parking at a cashless parking meter.</p> <p>The motorist wasn't able to pay for his parking charges with a card, so instead they erected a sign in his car with gold coins attached, proving they are good for the parking fees. </p> <p>The driver said the cashless revolution doesn't "suit their lifestyle", but added they are "willing to pay for parking with these coins any day of the week". </p> <p>Despite displaying their method of payment, the  North Sydney Council, who recently upgraded all their parking meters to cashless ones, explained to <em><a href="https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/major-136-fine-warning-after-fed-up-aussies-3-cashless-act-of-defiance-023528239.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Yahoo</a> Finance</em> this method could massively backfire.</p> <p>"The only way to avoid being fined is to comply with the signage restrictions for the space in which you have parked," a Council spokesperson said.</p> <p><span style="background-color: #ffffff;"><span style="color: #1d2228; font-family: YahooSans VF, Yahoo Sans, YahooSans, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><span style="caret-color: #1d2228;">"In metered spaces, you must pay using our parking meters. You are likely to receive a fine if </span></span></span>you leave a note and do not pay," with parking fines in this council setting you back $136. </p> <p>After the driver's unique payment method garnered attention on social media, many agreed with their sentiment saying there should always be an option for people to pay with cash.</p> <p>"Should always have a cash option," wrote one user, while another said, "How can they expect everyone to be credit card online app savvy anyway and download it while standing in the street? I have so much trouble paying."</p> <p>A third added, "This is a great idea, but the inspectors do not have a sense of humour, they just issue you with a fine."</p> <p><em>Image credits: Facebook</em></p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

Motorist fined $4000 for dodgy driver's license tactic

<p>A prominent Sydney lawyer has warned Aussie drivers against falsely nominating someone to take on their demerit points after one of his clients was fined $4000 for the illegal act. </p> <p>Speaking to <em>Yahoo News Australia</em>,  Sydney lawyer Avinash Singh said that there has been a significant spike in the practice in recent months. </p> <p>"In 2024, Transport for NSW (TfNSW) commenced a crackdown on false nominations of drivers," he told <em>Yahoo</em>.</p> <p> "There has been a widespread trend of people agreeing to take demerit points for other drivers.</p> <p>"The person nominated will usually charge a fee to take the demerit points. Often they are on international licences and may not even be in the country."</p> <p>He then explained the case of one of his clients who was issued a $4,000 fine for trying to offload their demerit points. </p> <p>"The reason the fine was so expensive was because the vehicle was registered as a company vehicle and the company had a record of previous offences," he explained.</p> <p>"As such, it was subject to the penalties for a corporation, which are significantly greater than that of an individual ($1,500)."</p> <p>He said the matter was listed at court where the $4,000 fine "could have been increased to $22,000".</p> <p>Singh managed to fight the fine on behalf of the driver, but warned that authorities are increasing their surveillance on this illegal act and have urged Aussies to remain vigilant. </p> <p>The tactic has gained popularity over the past few years, with the illegal service often being advertised on social media and the price of one demerit point going for anywhere between $30-$150.</p> <p><em>Image: Facebook/ Yahoo</em></p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

Motorist fined $387 for "handling wallet" while driving

<p>A motorist has collapsed after receiving a fine for $387, in which the fine claims he was holding his phone while driving. </p> <p>Sydney man Husni Tarmizi opened the infringement notice with his 62-year-old dad on Tuesday and admitted he was both "surprised" and "panicked" by the fine, leaving Husni to pick his father up off the floor after he collapsed from shock. </p> <p>Husni was confused by the fine, which also cost his dad 10 demerit points, as his father is rarely on his phone, and decided to take a closer look at the image captured by the mobile detection camera. </p> <p>"I went to the computer and downloaded the image and I could see clearly that it's a wallet [in his hand], you can see his phone is in the cradle," he told <a href="https://au.news.yahoo.com/driver-fined-387-and-cops-10-demerit-points-for-handling-wallet-while-driving-073557336.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>Yahoo News</em></a>.</p> <p>"In his left hand you can see the wallet and his right hand he's holding a $50 bill."</p> <p>Husni continued, "He was quite panicked, especially with the 10 demerit points... and I was scared a bit because he has a heart condition."</p> <p>The 62-year-old man said he recalls holding onto his wallet and the $50 note to pay for petrol over the Easter long weekend, which explains the hefty loss of demerit points.</p> <p>Tarmizi confirmed he has already appealed the infringement and is awaiting a response after people urged him to dispute it.</p> <p>"I've also written an appeal, it's called a review request, we'll see how that goes," he said.</p> <p>"For the older generation where they don't understand the technologies and stuff, it's scary."</p> <p><em>Image credits: Husni Tarmizi</em></p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

Eagle-eyed motorists spot funny typo on "confusing" new interchange

<p>The new interchange at Rozelle, in Sydney's inner west, has already copped backlash just days after its opening,  because of the confusing signage and changed traffic conditions causing chaos among commuters. </p> <p>Now, motorists have spotted another awkward blunder at the bustling "spaghetti junction", intended to improve traffic. </p> <p>Just metres away from the main intersection along Victoria Road and Darling Street, some poor road worker made the same typo twice, in a left-hand turn lane.</p> <p>Instead of saying  "buses excepted", they painted "buses expected", and now their mistake has gone viral on social media. </p> <p>"If I was a road, I'd expect buses too," one joked.</p> <p>"I get my bus near there and I'm constantly expecting buses that don't show, so seems accurate," another quipped. </p> <p>The interchange itself has been years in the making and opened up on Sunday. </p> <p>It was intended to connect drivers to the M4 and M8 tunnels, the City West Link, the Western Distributor and give access to the Anzac Bridge with a toll-free bypass of Victoria Road. </p> <p>While the aim of it was to improve traffic flow, just four days after its opening locals are still complaining about the chaotic strip, specifically it's poorly designed signage that has reportedly baffled drivers. </p> <p>One of the new signs suggested there was a toll from Iron Cove Bridge to Anzac Bridge, and while it is actually free, commuters are avoiding the tunnel and trying to switch across multiple roads to avoid presumed fee. </p> <p>Earlier this week, NSW Premier Chris Minns said: "Clearly it's confusing, that spaghetti junction is difficult to navigate and a lot of cars' GPS haven't caught up.</p> <p>"We'll change that sign and I understand the Minister for Roads is putting up those portable electronic signs to show people that you can use that road in particular and not pay the toll."</p> <p><em>Images: Twitter/ 9News</em></p>

Travel Trouble

Placeholder Content Image

"Be alert": Australia Post's urgent plea to motorists

<p>Australia Post has issued an urgent plea for motorists to look out for their local posties, after shocking new data revealed how many postal workers are injured on the job. </p> <p>The data has revealed that during the 2022-23 financial year, 65 posties were injured as a direct result of third-party traffic accidents, with injuries including everything from broken limbs to concussions.</p> <p>Many of these incidents resulted in hospital stays, extended periods of leave and lasting psychological trauma.</p> <p>Australia Post's General Manager of Safety and Wellbeing, Rod Maule, has said that even one vehicle-related accident is too many, and pleaded for motorists to drive safely at all times.</p> <p>"While we want our team to deliver for all Australians, we also want each of them to safely get home to their families at the end of the day," Mr Maule said.</p> <p>"Safety is our number-one priority, which is why we've invested millions of dollars into advanced technology and training to keep our team safe on the road. But it isn't just up to us," he added. "We are asking all drivers to be alert and keep an eye out for our posties, especially over the next few months as we ramp up deliveries in the lead-up to Christmas."</p> <p>The statement comes in the wake of shocking footage going viral of postal workers being hit by motorists.</p> <p>In an incident last month, a postie is seen riding across an intersection when, seemingly out of nowhere, he's struck by another motorist and knocked from his bike causing an injury to his leg.</p> <p><em>Image credits: Australia Post</em></p>

Travel Trouble

Placeholder Content Image

Brisbane officer captured punching and tasering motorist

<p>Footage of a brutal altercation between a police officer and a motorist has surfaced online following a catastrophic three-car crash.</p> <p>The Queensland Police officer is captured on video punching the motorist through the window of his car in Strathpine in Brisbane’s north.</p> <p>Police allege the “highly agitated” man was drinking from a wine bottle and was under the influence when the officer arrived on the scene.</p> <p>“After the officer attempted to take the bottle away several times, it was allegedly thrown towards him,” a Queensland Police spokesperson said.</p> <p>“After giving numerous directions for the man to remain in the car, it will be alleged he continued to attempt to leave the vehicle by kicking the door into the officer, who used physical force to contain the man in the vehicle.”</p> <p>The heated exchange occurred around 1:45pm on June 22 after a collision at the intersection of Gympie and Samsonvale roads.</p> <p>The officer is seen in the video approaching the passenger side of a white car where the motorist tries to leave the vehicle through the open window.</p> <p>The officer is then seen grabbing at an object the motorist is holding, which police allege was a wine bottle, before allegedly hitting him multiple times.</p> <p>The video shows the man retreat inside the car before making another attempt to exit through the window, where he is then struck again.</p> <p>The motorist falls back again before trying to exit for a third time, blocked once again by the officer.</p> <p>Police allege the man continued to try and leave the car and “after several verbal warnings, a taser was deployed”.</p> <p>“Additional officers arrived on scene and another officer was allegedly spat on by the man,” the spokesperson said.</p> <p>The man has since been taken to Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital while in custody to treat minor wounds.</p> <p>The scene was not short of witnesses, with several firefighters seen approaching the officer.</p> <p>“He needs to stop,” the woman filming the clip is heard saying.</p> <p>“Stop hitting him!”</p> <p>Senior police have reviewed body cam footage of the altercation as investigations continue.</p> <p><em>Image credit: 9News</em></p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

Motorists "gobsmacked" by confusing fines that are about to DOUBLE

<p>Transport officials in Queensland have warned residents to be on high alert as the installation of new high tech cameras has seen tens of thousands of fines issued in just a few months. </p> <p>The infrared cameras, which detect both mobile phone and seatbelt offences, were launched in Queensland in July last year. </p> <p>For their first three months of use, the cameras generated warnings to motorists doing the wrong thing. </p> <p>Since November, the cameras have been issuing fines, catching more than 75,000 people in just six months.</p> <p>Annabelle Brett was shocked when she received a fine in the mail, thinking she had been caught for speeding. </p> <p>"But when I saw that it was a seatbelt fine I was pretty gobsmacked," Brett told <em>A Current Affair</em>.</p> <p>Annabelle claims she always wears her seatbelt and was confused by the $400 fine. </p> <p>"If you are driving over 60 kilometres an hour, in my car and most modern cars nowadays anyway, it (the seatbelt alarm) goes mental. Like it's beeping the whole time," she said.</p> <p>After posting about her fine online, the Queensland resident was inundated with messages from other drivers who had received similar fines. </p> <p>One of those people was Antony Tseng, who was also caught on the new seatbelt cameras.</p> <p>"I thought initially, that's impossible, because I always wear my seatbelt. I drive a Tesla which is quite savvy in terms of technology; it would have obviously let me know," Tseng said.</p> <p>Andrew Mahon from Transport and Main Roads Queensland said the cameras rarely get it wrong.</p> <p>"The technology is exceptional, the image quality is very high quality and we can always determine whether or not an offence has occurred," Mahon said.</p> <p>Of the 75,000 fines handed out in the past six months, 20,000 have been for seatbelt offences.</p> <p>Currently the fine for not wearing a seatbelt, or not wearing it correctly is $413, but it will go up to $1078 from July 1st.</p> <p><em>Image credits: Getty Images</em></p>

Travel Trouble

Placeholder Content Image

The most bizarre traffic fines you've never heard of

<p dir="ltr">These little known road rules could cost you thousands of dollars - from splashing pedestrians, to honking goodbye to your mates. It’s just not worth it. </p> <ol> <li dir="ltr" aria-level="1"> <p dir="ltr" role="presentation"><strong>Leaving your key in the ignition</strong></p> </li> </ol> <p dir="ltr">You may think it’s saving you time because “I’m just going to be a couple of seconds/minutes” but doing this can cost you $114. </p> <p dir="ltr">Also, why would you risk having your car stolen?</p> <ol start="2"> <li dir="ltr" aria-level="1"> <p dir="ltr" role="presentation"><strong>Flashing headlights to warn of speed camera or RBT</strong></p> </li> </ol> <p dir="ltr">Other motorists will love you for the heads up but at what cost? $116 and a loss of one demerit point. </p> <ol start="3"> <li dir="ltr" aria-level="1"> <p dir="ltr" role="presentation"><strong>Not giving way to horses</strong></p> </li> </ol> <p dir="ltr">Bit of a weird one but you could be slugged with a $130 fine if you do not give way to horses on the road. </p> <p dir="ltr">Motorists must move as far left as possible and turn off the engine until the horse has trotted past.</p> <ol start="4"> <li dir="ltr" aria-level="1"> <p dir="ltr" role="presentation"><strong>Splashing pedestrians</strong></p> </li> </ol> <p dir="ltr">It may look like fun but imagine how the pedestrians feel? However, the $187 fine is actually only limited to splashing pedestrians waiting at a bus stop. </p> <ol start="5"> <li dir="ltr" aria-level="1"> <p dir="ltr" role="presentation"><strong>Speeding up while being overtaken</strong></p> </li> </ol> <p dir="ltr">Drivers who speed up while someone is trying to overtake them could be slapped with a $344 fine and lose two demerit points. </p> <ol start="6"> <li dir="ltr" aria-level="1"> <p dir="ltr" role="presentation"><strong>Cutting through service station</strong></p> </li> </ol> <p dir="ltr">We’re all guilty of cutting through the servo to not waste time at the red light. Not only is it dangerous and puts pedestrians at risk, but you will be handed a fine of $349. </p> <ol start="7"> <li dir="ltr" aria-level="1"> <p dir="ltr" role="presentation"><strong>Driving over nature strip in school zone</strong></p> </li> </ol> <p dir="ltr">Just don’t do it. You have kids walking, running or playing around and the last thing you want is to endanger them. </p> <p dir="ltr">If caught driving on the nature strip say goodbye to four demerit points and hello to the $464 fine. </p> <ol start="8"> <li dir="ltr" aria-level="1"> <p dir="ltr" role="presentation"><strong>Throwing apple core out the window</strong></p> </li> </ol> <p dir="ltr">Wait until you get home to throw away your rubbish and not out the car window. You may think it’s fine because an apple core is biodegradable, but it’s not. </p> <p dir="ltr">It will cost you $533 and two demerits so save your rubbish for when you get home.</p> <ol start="9"> <li dir="ltr" aria-level="1"> <p dir="ltr" role="presentation"><strong>Using your phone to pay at a drive-through</strong></p> </li> </ol> <p dir="ltr">We all know it's illegal to touch your phone while driving and in the drive-thru it’s not any different.</p> <p dir="ltr">Before even grabbing your phone to pay, you need to put your car into park and switch off the ignition. </p> <p dir="ltr">If caught doing the wrong thing you better hope the meal is worth the $534 fine. </p> <ol start="10"> <li dir="ltr" aria-level="1"> <p dir="ltr" role="presentation"><strong>Beeping goodbye and waving</strong></p> </li> </ol> <p dir="ltr">We’re all guilty of tooting our horn when leaving a family or friend’s place. But the fine is so hefty just remember you already said goodbye.</p> <p dir="ltr">If caught using your horn unnecessarily, you will be hit with $349 and waving will cost you another $349 because no body part should be outside of the vehicle.</p> <p dir="ltr">All together it’s $698 and three demerits. Not worth it at all. </p> <p dir="ltr"><em>Image: Shutterstock</em></p>

Travel Trouble

Placeholder Content Image

Oatlands killings spark major road rules changes

<p>Speed camera warning signs will be scrapped and motorists caught driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol will face harsher penalties under a number of new laws for NSW.</p> <p>The government is hoping the change will help crack down on those speeding, including removing warning signs often located 250m and 50m ahead of mobile speed cameras which would warn motorists to slow down.</p> <p>The changes have been introduced after four children were tragically killed by a drunk driver in Oatlands earlier in the year.</p> <p>Leila and Daniel Abdallah lost three children in the crash, and one of the children’s cousins was also killed.</p> <p>NSW Transport Minister Andrew Constance said the changes are about shifting culture and behaviour.</p> <p>“We want to make a difference,” he said.</p> <p>“We can't keep doing what we’re doing, year in, year out, knowing the impact it has on families, loved ones, children and our community.”</p> <p>Bridget Sakr, who lost her 11-year-old daughter Veronique in the crash, spoke to NCA NewsWire and said: “We’re extremely overwhelmed with the change in the law. It’s taken nine months to get this legislation into place, that’s never happened (as fast) before. I think that in itself speaks to how much impact this tragedy has had on people’s lives, all over Australia.”</p> <p>Ms Sakr was present at the announcement of the proposed new road rules alongside Mr and Mrs Abdallah, who lost their children Sienna, 8, Angelina, 12, and Antony, 13.</p> <p>The changes will be rolled out over a 12-month period.</p> <p>Mr Constance went on to reveal that harsher penalties will be introduced for those caught driving under the influence of alcohol and drugs from next year.</p> <p>Drivers are 23 times more likely to crash if they’re under the influence of alcohol and drugs, he said, citing recent research.</p> <p>“This massive, life-threatening risk needs a stronger penalty,” Mr Constance said.</p> <p>“Across our roads network we have seen this reckless and irresponsible behaviour result in far too many deaths and serious injuries, and these tougher penalties send the message that this behaviour won’t be tolerated.”</p> <p>Since 2015 over 100 serious crashes have involved a driver or rider with illegal levels of both alcohol and drugs in their system.</p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

Who should give way? Road rules quiz leaves drivers baffled

<p>A road rules quiz asking whether a pedestrian should give way to a car turning into a driveway has left social media users confused.</p> <p>Posted on Facebook by the Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads on Monday, the question came complete with a diagram that showed a pedestrian on a footpath next to a driveway.</p> <p>A car waiting to turn right into the driveway would have to cross a single, unbroken line.</p> <p>“With an increase in children walking to and from school who gives way? The orange car, or the pedestrian walking on the path?” the transport body asked.</p> <p>While the department revealed cars must give way to pedestrians on the footpath or the road, answers by Facebook users varied significantly.</p> <p>Many believed that car would have right of way.</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><iframe src="https://www.facebook.com/plugins/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2FTMRQld%2Fposts%2F2787934611249404&amp;width=500" width="500" height="658" style="border: none; overflow: hidden;" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" allow="encrypted-media"></iframe></p> <p>But others said the car should be permitted to cross the unbroken line.</p> <p>“I always thought you couldn’t turn into a driveway over a solid white line,” said one person.</p> <p>“You can’t cross on a solid line,” said another.</p> <p>To which the department replied: “You can cross a single continuous centre line to enter or leave a road, including entering or leaving a property and to safely pass a bike rider.</p> <p>“You can cross a single continuous centre line to overtake or to do a U-turn.”</p> <p>Another person said “laws of commonsense”, saying the pedestrian would have the right of way.</p> <p>“By laws of commonsense the pedestrian has the right of way here, he maybe blind, or have any other incapacities, but the driver should by law be ok, seems strange to needs ask the question,” they wrote.</p> <p>“You’d be surprised,” wrote the transport body.</p> <p>They also revealed that vehicles must give way because cars provide the driver with a lot more protection when compared to a pedestrian.</p> <p>“A minor collision could cause serious injury or death.”</p>

Domestic Travel

Placeholder Content Image

"He made it up": Police hit back at motorist fined for drinking water while driving

<p>Police have confirmed a motorist who claimed he was fined for drinking water made up the fine. </p> <p>However, QLD police have warned drivers they could still be prosecuted for taking a sip of any liquid -whether water or not -  if they are caught being reckless behind the wheel.</p> <p>Brock Harris, from Beaudesert, west of Gold Coast, said he was pulled over as he was turning into his driveway after working 12 hours in 39C heat. </p> <p>Mr Harris told radio listeners on<span> </span>ABC Radio Brisbane<span> </span>he was handed a $173 fine as well as one demerit point for driving with due care and attention. </p> <p>“As I was pulling into my street I was pulled over by the police and told it was illegal to drink anything while driving,” he told ABC’s Rebecca Levingston at the time. </p> <p>“If it is against the law then I’ll pay the fine, but it’s not compassionate to fine someone on a 39-degree day (for trying to) stay hydrated.</p> <p>“The policeman told me there was nothing I could do and he was doing his job — but I am going to challenge the fine.”</p> <p>While QLD Police have confirmed the fine was not issued to Mr Harris, the state’s Police Superintendent David Johnson told the ABC motorists must still be cautious behind the wheel. </p> <p>“There are many people who consume drinks while driving and do it safely in a safe manner,” he said. </p> <p>“For us to issue a fine we have to look at the circumstances to see if the driver's actions are causing risks to themselves or others.</p> <p>“Driving without due care and attention was once put before court, but these days it’s a traffic infringement notice that is issued.</p> <p>Driving without due care and attention carries a $533 fine and three demerit points, according to the Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads website.</p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

The gobsmacking reason one motorist was fined $173 – and it could have been much worse

<p>A Queensland motorist says he was given a $173 fine and one demerit point for a seemingly innocent reason - taking a sip of water behind the wheel. </p> <p>Brock Harris, told<span> </span><a rel="noopener" href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-10-10/man-fined-for-drinking-water-at-the-wheel/11589030?sf221211951=1" target="_blank"><em>ABC Radio Brisbane</em><span> </span></a>he was driving home to Beaudesert about 70km from Brisbane after a long 12-hour work day, when he was pulled over by police. </p> <p>He told the radio station he’d taken a sip from his 600ml plastic bottle of water as he was turning onto his street, when an officer directed his lights at him. </p> <p>“As I was pulling into my street I was pulled over by the police and told it was illegal to drink anything while driving,” he told<span> </span>ABC’s<span> </span>Rebecca Levingston.</p> <p>The police officer reportedly told Mr Harris that he was being issued a $173 fine and one demerit point as a result of him “not paying due care and attention”.</p> <p>“If it is against the law then I’ll pay the fine, but it’s not compassionate to fine someone on a 39-degree day (for trying to) stay hydrated,” he said.</p> <p>“The policeman told me there was nothing I could do and he was doing his job — but I am going to challenge the fine.”</p> <p>A Queensland Police spokesperson told<span> </span><em><a rel="noopener" href="https://www.news.com.au/technology/innovation/motoring/on-the-road/driver-says-he-was-fined-173-and-a-demerit-point-for-drinking-water/news-story/08fc919677de7e426f047fe003f82806" target="_blank">news.com.au </a></em>that fines are usually issued under such circumstances if the action causes the driver to not be in control of their vehicle. </p> <p>Queensland Police Superintendent David Johnson’ also reaffirmed the same sentiment, saying there are many drivers who consume drinks safely on the road. </p> <p>“For us to issue a fine we have to look at the circumstances to see if the driver’s actions are causing risks to themselves or others,” he said.</p> <p>“Driving without due care and attention was once put before court, but these days it’s a traffic infringement notice that is issued.”</p> <p>The Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads website says driving without due care and attention carries a hefty $533 fine and three demerit points. </p> <p>A Transport and Main Roads spokesperson noted that the on-the-spot fine for a driver not having proper control of a vehicle is $311.</p> <p>“We all have a role to play in road safety,” they said.</p> <p>“Distracted drivers are a danger not only to themselves and their passengers, but to other road users as well. It only takes a split second to lose your concentration.”</p>

Travel Trouble

Placeholder Content Image

New road rule becomes law today: Ignoring it will cost you $448

<p>Motorists in New South Wales will have to follow a new road rule that came into effect on Thursday. </p> <p>Failure to comply will incur an eye-watering $448 fine and a loss of three demerit points. </p> <p>The new road rule demands drivers slow down to a speed of 40 km/h when passing a stationary police vehicle or emergency vehicles with flashing red and blue lights. </p> <p>The law will also apply to passing tow truck operators parked on the side of the road. </p> <p>Transport for NSW says the new rule is being employed to improve the safety of vulnerable roadside workers which includes tow truck operators and breakdown assistance workers, as well as emergency service workers. </p> <p>The NSW government announced last year they would be trialling the new rule throughout the state. </p> <p>Last week it was announced amendments to the law, so the ruling only applies on roads where the speed limit is 80km/h or less.</p> <p>Transport for NSW said the change comes after driver feedback regarded the new measure as “generally negative”. </p> <p>It said motorists believed it was increasing the level of danger in certain circumstances. </p> <p>“We’ve monitored the impact of the rule over the past year and taken on board feedback from the public and stakeholders about the trial. We’re now implementing changes to make the rule safer for everyone,” Transport Minister Andrew Constance said.</p> <p>If on a road where the speed limit is 90km/h or higher, motorists must slow down to a speed “reasonable for the circumstances”.</p> <p>Drivers on the road must also provide a “sufficient” amount of space between their vehicles and the vehicle displaying flashing lights, or tow trucks on the side of the road. </p> <p>Drivers travelling on a multi-lane road are required to change lanes to keep the lane next to the stationary vehicle vacant if it is safe to do so.</p> <p>“Tow truck and breakdown assistance workers face similar risks on the road to emergency service workers. A commitment was made to consider the application of the rule to other at-risk workers over the 12-month trial period,” Transport for NSW said.</p> <p>“Now that the rule is being made safer in higher speed environments, it is appropriate to extend the rule and enhance safety for these at-risk workers.”</p> <p>Motorists in WA, Victoria and Queensland must pass stationary emergency vehicles at 40km/h in all zones while in SA drivers are required to drop down to 25km/h.</p>

Domestic Travel

Placeholder Content Image

Motorist's mistake that cost her $311

<p>A police officer was faced with a shocking sight after a woman drove past him with two dogs roaming in her car, with one hanging out the window and the other sitting freely in her lap. </p> <p>Queensland Police have shared shocking footage of a 35-year-old Gold Coast woman driving down a motorway, with one of the dogs “walking around the car and dash at will”.</p> <p>“This driver has learnt that the car is no place for lapdogs,” they shared on Twitter.</p> <p>“Police would like to remind all motorists that driving with unrestrained people and animals can result in a fine. Keep you and your pets safe.”</p> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"> <p dir="ltr">This driver has learnt that the car is no place for lap dogs. Police would like to remind all motorists that driving with unrestrained people and animals can result in a fine. Keep you and your pets safe. 🐾🚘 More information here: <a href="https://t.co/HN1drfBCME">https://t.co/HN1drfBCME</a> <a href="https://t.co/1ZTFinRZ63">pic.twitter.com/1ZTFinRZ63</a></p> — Queensland Police (@QldPolice) <a href="https://twitter.com/QldPolice/status/1175994848827936768?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 23, 2019</a></blockquote> <p>The footage recorded the officer saying “That’s absolutely ridiculous. Look at this. Two dogs on her lap”.</p> <p>He then pulls the woman over and she knows exactly why. </p> <p>“You know why I’m talking to you today, don’t you?” he asks.</p> <p>“Because of my dogs,” she replies.</p> <p>“You can’t have two dogs on your lap,” he responds.</p> <p>“It’s a bit distracting. One of them was out the window, the other one was bouncing around the dash.”</p> <p>The officer gave the woman a fine of $311 for driving with a person or animal in her lap. </p> <p>“While they are distracting, it’s also important for all to put the safety of all road users and passengers first when getting behind the wheel,” police said.</p> <p>The RSPCA says more than 5000 animals are killed in crashes in Australia each year.</p>

Domestic Travel

Placeholder Content Image

“Highway robbery”: This Aussie city charges motorists $31.41 an hour for off-street parking

<p>In a move that’s been described as “highway robbery”, Brisbane CBD is charging motorists the highest short-term off-street parking rates in Australia at an average of $31.41 an hour and $18.30 for just 30 minutes.</p> <p>Queensland’s motoring group RACQ’s latest CBD Parking Prices Report revealed that the most expensive 30 minute and one-hour parking in Brisbane was at the Treasury Hotel, where motorists pay a massive $50.</p> <p>Care Park on Tank Street has the most expensive all-day parking at $97.</p> <p>In surprising news, Brisbane also has the cheapest on-street parking at just $5 an hour compared with Melbourne and Sydney at $7 an and $7.40 an hour.</p> <p>RACQ spokeswoman Renee Smith said that Brisbane drivers pay the highest rates and that it punishes businesses in the CBD.</p> <p>“It’s highway robbery for motorists and what we end up seeing is CBD shops and restaurants punished because people can’t justify the cost of a visit,” Ms Smith said in a statement to <a rel="noopener" href="https://www.news.com.au/finance/money/costs/highway-robbery-brisbane-cbd-named-australias-most-expensive-offstreet-parking-at-3141-an-hour/news-story/57eb61949c95a0d3725098e76425b3b8" target="_blank"><em>news.com.au</em></a>.</p> <p>“Drivers will also be appalled to learn parking all day in Brisbane, at $76.77, is only on average $1 cheaper than in Sydney. The price jumped more than $4 in the past year. If we don’t see better parking rates in the city, more and more drivers will favour suburban shopping centres where parking is either free or much cheaper.”</p> <p>Smith said that it was encouraging to see the number of parking stations charging the maximum fee of $89 a day has dropped from seven to four in the last year.</p> <p>“Drivers still need to employ frugal tactics in order to avoid being stung at the exit station, including booking ahead online and taking advantage of early bird rates,” she said.</p> <p><strong>The most expensive off-street places to park all-day in Brisbane</strong></p> <ol> <li>40 Tank Street – Care Park at $97</li> <li>Eagle Street Pier – Wilson at $89</li> <li>Waterfront Place 1 Eagle – Wilson at $89</li> <li>Central Plaza 2 – Wilson at $89</li> <li>363 Adelaide Street – Wilson at $89 <span> </span><span> </span><span> </span></li> </ol>

News

Placeholder Content Image

How can we drive safely for longer?

<p>Research by Roy Morgan has revealed that there are now more 80+ year old Australians driving cars than there are in the 18 to 24 age group.</p> <p>The number of those over 80 who are still actively driving has increased to 69% while the number in the younger age group is decreasing. This shift in road users may prompt some to think that this is a negative trend for road safety, but is it accurate to assume that older drivers are a greater risk to themselves and other road users?</p> <p><strong>The facts suggest otherwise</strong><br />Making sweeping generalisations about any age group is fraught with danger. When it comes to the older age groups the truth is that there is no evidence to suggest that they represent a higher safety risk than any other segment of the driving population.</p> <p>Elderly drivers tend not to be traffic-weavers, tailgaters or speed hoons, which are behaviours that some younger drivers are sometimes guilty of. Older drivers have the benefit of a lifetime of experience behind them too and usually drive more conservatively.</p> <p>What’s more, modern cars tend to be a lot easier to drive and have greater safety features built in, which allows a greater number of older motorists to stay behind the wheel.</p> <p><strong>A focus on ability, not age<br /></strong>Rather than focus on an age group as a whole, the emphasis needs to be on assessment of faculties and fitness to drive. These are factors that apply to any age group – not just those in retirement.</p> <p>While age may naturally result in a higher incidence in deterioration of some physical attributes, it doesn’t mean that all older Australians should be tarred with the same brush.</p> <p><strong>Regulators are recognising the reality</strong> <br />The evidence that older drivers do not pose a higher road safety risk is being recognised by state authorities, most of whom no longer have a requirement for mandatory driving tests based on age alone. In fact, New South Wales is the only state that still requires mandatory age based driving tests. The regulations in other states vary, but are based fundamentally on medical fitness and self-assessment.</p> <p>Of course any kind of medical condition or physical impairment that may impede driving ability needs to be assessed by a doctor, so it is important for all age groups to be prepared to recognise if they do need to be checked.</p> <p>Any medical condition that can be attributed to causing an accident may end up affecting insurance claims and the legal ramifications for the driver, so it is really not worth the risk of delaying or avoiding medical advice about your fitness to drive.</p> <p><strong>Tell-tale signs to be aware of<br /></strong>Being self-aware about your physical capabilities is something that should not be taken lightly. Apart from having regular medical check-ups, consider this checklist of 12 tell-tale signs that may indicate deterioration in your driving ability:</p> <p>1. Difficulty seeing road signs, markings, kerbs, medians</p> <p>2. Trouble seeing other vehicles, motorcyclists, cyclists and pedestrians</p> <p>3. Judging gaps in the traffic when merging</p> <p>4. A tendency for your mind to wander</p> <p>5. Feelings of anxiety in heavy traffic or at intersections</p> <p>6. Confusion about who has right of way</p> <p>7. Difficulty in maintaining correct consistent speeds (either too fast or too slow)</p> <p>8. Agitation of other motorists around you</p> <p>9. Slow reactions to sudden hazards</p> <p>10. Becoming easily tired while driving</p> <p>11. Comments by friends, family members or doctor about your suitability for driving</p> <p>12. Losing your way whilst driving on familiar routes</p> <p>If any of these signs strike a chord with you then you should seek further advice from a health professional who will be able to recommend whether you should cease driving or limit driving to safer times, such as daytime only or when roads are quieter.</p> <p><strong>There are alternatives</strong> <br />If it turns out that you (or your parents) do need to limit or cease driving altogether, this doesn’t mean giving up freedom and independence. There are many alternatives that can generally take care of most of the trips you would normally make in the car yourself.</p> <p><strong>Public transport:</strong> depending on where you live, this can be a very economical and convenient way to get around.</p> <p><strong>Taxis:</strong> you may feel this is an extravagant way to travel but think about it - if you are not paying for fuel, insurance, registration, repairs and tyres then taxis can be a viable alternative if you are selective about what trips you use them for. It’s even cheaper if you can share the ride with friends and split the cost. Consider using a service like Uber too, as this can often be cheaper than a taxi, if it is outside of peak usage periods.</p> <p><strong>Walking and cycling:</strong> It may be a limited way of getting around but think about how many car trips are for short trips to local shops, friends and clubs. Leg power may replace many of these journeys and it is also a great way to keep fit.</p> <p><strong>Community transport:</strong> local organisations may have community transport services that use buses or cars for essential trips such as medical or hospital appointments. Local clubs and shopping centres often have shuttle buses. Start by investigating this with your local council to find out what is available in your area.</p> <p><strong>Motorised mobility devices:</strong> these are becoming quite sophisticated and are great for short distance travel if you (or a loved one) are not able to walk or cycle.</p> <p><em>Republished with permission of </em><a href="https://www.wyza.com.au/articles/lifestyle/wyza-life/how-can-we-drive-safely-for-longer.aspx"><em>Wyza.com.au.</em></a></p>

Retirement Life

Placeholder Content Image

How can we drive safely for longer?

<p>Research by Roy Morgan has revealed that there are now more 80+ year old Australians driving cars than there are in the 18 to 24 age group.</p> <p>The number of those over 80 who are still actively driving has increased to 69% while the number in the younger age group is decreasing. This shift in road users may prompt some to think that this is a negative trend for road safety, but is it accurate to assume that older drivers are a greater risk to themselves and other road users?</p> <p><strong>The facts suggest otherwise</strong><br />Making sweeping generalisations about any age group is fraught with danger. When it comes to the older age groups the truth is that there is no evidence to suggest that they represent a higher safety risk than any other segment of the driving population.</p> <p>Elderly drivers tend not to be traffic-weavers, tailgaters or speed hoons, which are behaviours that some younger drivers are sometimes guilty of. Older drivers have the benefit of a lifetime of experience behind them too and usually drive more conservatively.</p> <p>What’s more, modern cars tend to be a lot easier to drive and have greater safety features built in, which allows a greater number of older motorists to stay behind the wheel.</p> <p><strong>A focus on ability, not age<br /></strong>Rather than focus on an age group as a whole, the emphasis needs to be on assessment of faculties and fitness to drive. These are factors that apply to any age group – not just those in retirement.</p> <p>While age may naturally result in a higher incidence in deterioration of some physical attributes, it doesn’t mean that all older Australians should be tarred with the same brush.</p> <p><strong>Regulators are recognising the reality</strong> <br />The evidence that older drivers do not pose a higher road safety risk is being recognised by state authorities, most of whom no longer have a requirement for mandatory driving tests based on age alone. In fact, New South Wales is the only state that still requires mandatory age based driving tests. The regulations in other states vary, but are based fundamentally on medical fitness and self-assessment.</p> <p>Of course any kind of medical condition or physical impairment that may impede driving ability needs to be assessed by a doctor, so it is important for all age groups to be prepared to recognise if they do need to be checked.</p> <p>Any medical condition that can be attributed to causing an accident may end up affecting insurance claims and the legal ramifications for the driver, so it is really not worth the risk of delaying or avoiding medical advice about your fitness to drive.</p> <p><strong>Tell-tale signs to be aware of<br /></strong>Being self-aware about your physical capabilities is something that should not be taken lightly. Apart from having regular medical check-ups, consider this checklist of 12 tell-tale signs that may indicate deterioration in your driving ability:</p> <p>1. Difficulty seeing road signs, markings, kerbs, medians</p> <p>2. Trouble seeing other vehicles, motorcyclists, cyclists and pedestrians</p> <p>3. Judging gaps in the traffic when merging</p> <p>4. A tendency for your mind to wander</p> <p>5. Feelings of anxiety in heavy traffic or at intersections</p> <p>6. Confusion about who has right of way</p> <p>7. Difficulty in maintaining correct consistent speeds (either too fast or too slow)</p> <p>8. Agitation of other motorists around you</p> <p>9. Slow reactions to sudden hazards</p> <p>10. Becoming easily tired while driving</p> <p>11. Comments by friends, family members or doctor about your suitability for driving</p> <p>12. Losing your way whilst driving on familiar routes</p> <p>If any of these signs strike a chord with you then you should seek further advice from a health professional who will be able to recommend whether you should cease driving or limit driving to safer times, such as daytime only or when roads are quieter.</p> <p><strong>There are alternatives</strong> <br />If it turns out that you (or your parents) do need to limit or cease driving altogether, this doesn’t mean giving up freedom and independence. There are many alternatives that can generally take care of most of the trips you would normally make in the car yourself.</p> <p><strong>Public transport:</strong> depending on where you live, this can be a very economical and convenient way to get around.</p> <p><strong>Taxis:</strong> you may feel this is an extravagant way to travel but think about it - if you are not paying for fuel, insurance, registration, repairs and tyres then taxis can be a viable alternative if you are selective about what trips you use them for. It’s even cheaper if you can share the ride with friends and split the cost. Consider using a service like Uber too, as this can often be cheaper than a taxi, if it is outside of peak usage periods.</p> <p><strong>Walking and cycling:</strong> It may be a limited way of getting around but think about how many car trips are for short trips to local shops, friends and clubs. Leg power may replace many of these journeys and it is also a great way to keep fit.</p> <p><strong>Community transport:</strong> local organisations may have community transport services that use buses or cars for essential trips such as medical or hospital appointments. Local clubs and shopping centres often have shuttle buses. Start by investigating this with your local council to find out what is available in your area.</p> <p><strong>Motorised mobility devices:</strong> these are becoming quite sophisticated and are great for short distance travel if you (or a loved one) are not able to walk or cycle.</p> <p><em>Republished with permission of </em><a href="https://www.wyza.com.au/articles/lifestyle/wyza-life/how-can-we-drive-safely-for-longer.aspx"><em>Wyza.com.au.</em></a></p>

Retirement Life

Placeholder Content Image

Who should give way? Motorist vs cyclist quiz sparks furious debate

<p>A road rules quiz that was meant to spark discussion on who should give way has instead left drivers frustrated and led to a furious debate. </p> <p>The RACQ posted to Facebook on Thursday a graphic depicting a yellow car travelling in a left lane and a cyclist not too far behind. </p> <p>The car wants to turn left while the cyclist wants to keep going straight. </p> <p>“The cyclist is catching up to the yellow vehicle in slow traffic, who gives way, the driver or cyclist?” the RACQ wrote.</p> <p>While the answer was the cyclist needs to give way to the car, many took to the comments to complain about bike riders. </p> <p>“A cyclist must not ride past or overtake to the left of a vehicle that is indicating and turning left,” the RACQ wrote.</p> <p>“If the vehicle was behind the cyclist near the intersection, the driver should slow down and turn behind the bicycle rider.”</p> <p><iframe src="https://www.facebook.com/plugins/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fracqofficial%2Fphotos%2Fa.185021091535422%2F2334039766633533%2F%3Ftype%3D3&amp;width=500" width="500" height="696" style="border: none; overflow: hidden;" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" allow="encrypted-media"></iframe></p> <p>One user commented beneath the post to write: “I won't give way to a cyclist ever I don't care what the rules are I pay rego and insurance they don’t.”</p> <p>Another added: “Nanny law protects cyclists."</p> <p>“They can ride wherever they like and expect motorists to get out of their way.”</p> <p>“most cyclist would think they have the right of way anyway, and just power through and sue the driver for not giving way,” another person wrote. </p> <p>However, cyclists did not take the lashings lying down. </p> <p>“Nice to know as a cyclist I can stop paying income tax and council rates then,” one man wrote. </p> <p>Another comment read: “I pay rego, and I ride a bike, which incidentally, doesn't cause wear and tear on the road like your car does.”</p>

Legal

Our Partners