Placeholder Content Image

"Out-of-touch" Project stars slammed over clash with renter advocate

<p>Social media users have slammed <em>The Project </em>hosts,  following their recent interview with a renter advocate who encourages Aussies struggling with the housing crisis to squat in empty homes. </p> <p>Jordan van den Berg,  founder of the S*** Rentals website shared a video over the weekend outside a rundown house in Chadstone, Melbourne, saying: “Are you sick of rich people hoarding empty houses during a housing crisis? I know I am." </p> <p>“Here’s how you can do something about it.” </p> <p>He then encouraged people to submit information on empty homes in their suburbs via a form on his website, which he plans to promote on his socials so those struggling to find a home could squat in them. </p> <p>“Fun fact – squatting in Australia is not necessarily illegal, which is the best type of legal, especially if the front door doesn’t actually lock," he said. </p> <p>On Monday, he appeared on The Project to talk about his controversial plans, and was grilled by the show's hosts. </p> <p>“I know we’re in a pretty serious housing crisis, but do you really think encouraging people to squat in private properties is the way to fix it?" asked co-host Sarah Harris. </p> <p> “Let me answer your question by asking you a question. Do you think it’s right we have thousands of vacant, abandoned homes while we have people living on the street?” van de Berg replied. </p> <p>Harris said she didn’t and asked whether the solving the housing crisis should be focused on policy instead.</p> <p>Later in the interview, panellist Steve Price casted his doubts on whether there actually were a lot of vacant homes, but van de Berg replied that he'd received over 300 submissions from Aussies about empty homes in their suburbs. </p> <p>van de Berg also said that desperate people are even squatting in abandoned properties, and added: “If someone needs a house, they can reach out to me and I’ll send them [details about] an empty home."</p> <p>Harris was shocked that people would “basically camp out in abandoned houses with no power" which van den Berg argued that “camping out inside” was likely better than sleeping on the streets or in a park.</p> <p>Co-host Waleed Aly then asked whether van de Berg  was encouraging people to break the law, but he pointed out that squatting – done properly – isn’t technically illegal.</p> <p>The interview has been slammed on social media, with Writer and comedian John Delmenico posting on X: “Watching the rich out-of-touch panel on the Project realise in real time that not everyone is rich is so bizarre.</p> <p>"Especially the part where Pingers has to explain that being in a house is safer than sleeping on the street. How do they host the news with no connection to reality?”</p> <p>Others agreed mocking the panellists’ shock that “shelter without electricity is better than no shelter with no electricity”.</p> <p>“She was laughing at the fact that ppl would camp out in abandoned houses with no power/water, until he put her in her place by reminding her they’re better off camping under shelter than outside. Mic drop moment," one wrote. </p> <p>“Homelessness exists … it’s quite a big problem actually," another added. </p> <p>However, a few others agreed with the <em>Project</em> hosts. </p> <p>“Encouraging people to squat, who does he think he is?" one wrote. </p> <p>“He thinks he’s doing a good thing, but he’s given absolutely no critical thought to the implications of encouraging people to take over ‘empty homes’," another added. </p> <p>Leo Patterson Ross, chief executive of the Tenants Union of NSW, said that van den Berg was “drawing attention to issues that government should be acting on”.</p> <p>“In the middle of a housing crisis with growing levels of homelessness, we should be looking to ensure homes are not left vacant,” Patterson Ross said.</p> <p>“If a person leaves a property unattended and empty for 12 years, then I think many of us would agree it seems fair that the community can reclaim usage to provide a home, whether that be individuals or government.”</p> <p><em>Image: The Project</em></p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

Waleed Aly and Steve Price clash over damning Voice letter

<p>Waleed Aly and Steve Price have clashed over an anonymous letter from Yes campaigners, condemning those who opposed the Voice to Parliament. </p> <p>On Sunday night, a lengthy and unsigned letter was shared by activists associated with the Uluru Dialogue group, as the letter slammed No voters for committing "a shameful act" by contributing to the Voice defeat. </p> <p>On <em>The Project</em>, Price was quick to slam the author of the letter, who addressed the message to the Prime Minister and all federal members of parliament, saying they did not have "the guts" to sign it. </p> <p>"It seems to me the Yes campaign hasn't learned anything about the result that happened Saturday two weeks ago," he said on Monday night. </p> <p>"The public voted 60 (per cent) No, 40 (per cent) Yes and yet, they pen a letter that they then send to the Cabinet and Prime Minister calling people who voted No as doing a shameful act, suggesting No voters are racists."</p> <p>"If you are going to do that, at least have the courage to put your name to it."</p> <p>Aly then leapt to the defence of those who wrote the anonymous letter, saying, "I don't think they said all No voters were racist."</p> <p>"They said racism was a big part of the campaign and the vote, they are inextricably bound up."</p> <p>Aly admitted that while he did not agree with everything in the letter, it was "hard to have a simple response to it".</p> <p>"They must be so hurting. I can't deny them that. Whether we agree or not," he said.</p> <p>The open letter claims to be "the collective insights and views of a group of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leaders, community members and organisations who supported Yes".</p> <p>The published letter said, "The truth is that the majority of Australians have committed a shameful act whether knowingly or not, and there is nothing positive to be interpreted from it. We needed truth to be told to the Australian people." </p> <p><em>Image credits: The Project</em></p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

Ben Fordham clashes with Albo over the Voice to Parliament

<p>Ben Fordham has clashed with Anthony Albanese over the logistics of the Voice to Parliament in a fiery 40 minute interview. </p> <p>The radio shock jock interrogated the prime minister over how much influence the Voice will have if it is voted in by the public, with the pair clashing live on air. </p> <p>In the blistering interview, Fordham asked Albo about flagging support for the Voice to parliament and whether the model of Indigenous recognition and advisory body should be changed.</p> <p>“We know that when the Voice asks for something that you don't like, you’re going to say no anyway, so why not lead at a time like this and don’t risk the very important recognition in the constitution for Indigenous Australians by getting it tied up with the Voice?” Mr Fordham asked.</p> <p>“When you have a look at those numbers, it's falling through the floor, so why not use your power as Prime Minister … legislate the voice and let us vote on recognition.”</p> <blockquote class="instagram-media" style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cu3IGhTth64/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="14"> <div style="padding: 16px;"> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"> </div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"> </div> </div> </div> <div style="padding: 19% 0;"> </div> <div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"> </div> <div style="padding-top: 8px;"> <div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div> </div> <div style="padding: 12.5% 0;"> </div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; margin-bottom: 14px; align-items: center;"> <div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(0px) translateY(7px);"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; height: 12.5px; transform: rotate(-45deg) translateX(3px) translateY(1px); width: 12.5px; flex-grow: 0; margin-right: 14px; margin-left: 2px;"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(9px) translateY(-18px);"> </div> </div> <div style="margin-left: 8px;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 20px; width: 20px;"> </div> <div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 2px solid transparent; border-left: 6px solid #f4f4f4; border-bottom: 2px solid transparent; transform: translateX(16px) translateY(-4px) rotate(30deg);"> </div> </div> <div style="margin-left: auto;"> <div style="width: 0px; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-right: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(16px);"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; flex-grow: 0; height: 12px; width: 16px; transform: translateY(-4px);"> </div> <div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-left: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(-4px) translateX(8px);"> </div> </div> </div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 24px;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 224px;"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 144px;"> </div> </div> <p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;"><a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none;" href="https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cu3IGhTth64/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank" rel="noopener">A post shared by Joel Jammal (@joeljammal)</a></p> </div> </blockquote> <p>The referendum, which would enshrine the advisory body in the constitution, will be put to the people later this year despite a decline in support reflected in recent opinion polls. </p> <p>Albo didn't hold back to Fordham's line of questioning, encouraging him to "get on board" with the change, and reiterated the radio host had the responsibility to not raise “red herrings” on his program about the reality of what the Voice could offer. </p> <p>“You know full well when this is successful and there is a Voice, you know it won’t have a veto (on government policy),” the Prime Minister began. </p> <p>“I understand, but I’m worried about it failing,” the radio host quipped back. </p> <p>“Well get on board Ben. Guess what. You’re in a position to make a difference and (fight) to help it succeed, as (are) other people in the media, by talking what it’s about, not by raising things that are not going to be relevant.”</p> <p>In recent months, the government has faced a barrage of questions from the opposition about the extent of influence the Voice will have, should Australians agree to establish the body in a vote at the end of the year.</p> <p>Fordham continued his questions as he asked if the Voice would have certain powers, which have been outlined by the "yes" campaign. </p> <p>“I wonder if you agree with them on some of the following points … yes or no, will the voice be able to speak directly to the RBA?” the radio host asked. </p> <p>“I can't talk directly to the RBA board and I’m the Prime Minister … Can I just make this point because I know where you’re reading from. You’re reading from the ‘no’ pamphlet,” Mr Albanese responded. </p> <p>Mr Fordham hit back and slammed the Labor leader for accusing him of not doing his own homework, saying, “Excuse me Prime Minister … I'm reading from my own questions that I have written so I don’t misquote people.”</p> <p>Albanese concluded his rant, slamming much of the media coverage around the Voice, and condemning many seemingly irrelevant conversations around the matter, saying, “We have had a debate about things that aren’t happening rather than about things that are.”</p> <p><em>Image credits: Getty Images / Instagram </em></p> <div class="media image" style="caret-color: #000000; color: #000000; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none; box-sizing: inherit; display: flex; flex-direction: column; align-items: center; width: 705.202209px; margin-bottom: 24px; max-width: 100%;"> </div>

News

Placeholder Content Image

Furious chef lets loose after clash with vegan protestors

<p>Celebrity chef John Mountain has doubled down on his vow to ban vegans from his restaurant in Perth, after he was targeted by angry vegan activists for the second time. </p> <p>The chef clashed with vegan protestor Tash Peterson on Saturday, after she stormed his booked-out restaurant with other activists in tow. </p> <p>Peterson and other activists stood outside with a megaphone, while shouting and playing sounds of squealing pigs, moments before the altercation was caught on camera.</p> <p>Speaking candidly on <em>A Current Affair</em>, Mountain said he planing his revenge to aggravate the protestors in retaliation. </p> <p>"You're barred for life and whenever I open any other business, now I'm going to start opening steak restaurants just to piss you off," John Mountain told <em>ACA</em> host Leila McKinnon about the activists who tried to storm his restaurant.</p> <p>When Peterson and her posse of protestors stormed his restaurant, called Fyre, on Saturday, Mountain said he'd had enough and confronted them. </p> <p>"I lost my cool because now it's really disrupting my business and I could see the look on my customers' faces, my staff — they were all a little scared and a bit nervous and I just stormed out," Mountain said.</p> <p>Police are investigating allegations of assault during the clash, after Peterson filed a report with attending officers.</p> <p>"We're not going after this restaurant because they're banning vegans — yes that was maybe a reason that instigated it — but at the end of the day it's because this man is profiting from animal abuse and murder and he's also glamourising it," she said on Sunday. </p> <p>Mountain defended his choice to retaliate against the protestors, saying he chose to stand up to the bullies to "protect my business". </p> <p>"Bullies come in all different shapes and sizes and these lot just happen to be the vegans."</p> <p>The chef became emotional while discussing the altercation, sharing how the war against vegans has greatly impacted his personal life.</p> <p>"I lost my partner because of this, I lost a relationship, I thought I was going to marry this woman and she just couldn't handle the amount of attention," he said while choking up with emotion.</p> <p>"Thanks vegans."</p> <p>The clash with protestors comes just weeks after Mountain posted on social media that vegans were now <a href="https://oversixty.com.au/lifestyle/food-wine/f-k-vegans-top-chef-bans-vegans-from-restaurant" target="_blank" rel="noopener">banned</a> from his restaurant due to "mental health reasons", sparking outrage among activists and the vegan community.</p> <p><em>Image credits: A Current Affair / 9News </em></p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

Millennials clash with Boomers in the battle of the housing market

<p>A 27-year-old home loan document has reignited debate over which generation had the biggest mountain to climb in their quest to buy a place to call their own. Read more: </p> <p>The document, uploaded to the Facebook group Perth Reflect, outlines ANZ bank’s various interest rates offered on “owner occupied” homes, as well as those available for “investment property loans”, both respectively effective as of February and March 1996. </p> <p>The poster encouraged the group to discuss the find, and to share their experience with their own first home loans, with the caption “found this in our filing cabinet (1996) and was wondering what interest rates others were paying on their first home loan.”</p> <p>In 1996, the East Start loan for a home was 7.95 per cent per annum, and a variable at 10.50 per cent. Fixed rates began at 8.69 per cent for one year term, and went up to 9.69 per cent for five years. Loan terms for homes were offered up to 25 years, and 20 for investment properties.</p> <p>Meanwhile, in 2023, ANZ boasts a variable interest rate of 5.09 per cent per annum. Fixed index rates now begin at 5.69 per cent, 6.59 per cent for five years, and peak at 7.69 per cent for 10 years. This comes after Australia’s Reverse Bank passed down nine consecutive rises, with the cash rate reaching a 10-year high. </p> <p>The reveal came as a surprise to some, with the numbers of paper appearing much worse for those trying to buy a property in the ‘90s. And in the Facebook comment section, some recalled how their actual rates were even higher than the document suggested.</p> <p>“Paid 17.5 per cent initially, but was on variable,” wrote one of a purchase in the late ‘80s. </p> <p>Another noted how those with a fixed term loan believed they had it “much better” at the time. </p> <p>The younger members of the group, however, were quick to point out that while the numbers looked to be in favour of the older generation, the rates for 2023 did not accurately compare with those from 1996. </p> <p>“Houses were a 5th of the price,” one wrote, referencing an old and recurring argument about the disparity in house prices over the years. </p> <p>It was mentioned that while interest rates were high, prices were low, and “everything was affordable”. </p> <p>The discussion over the impact of the cost of living on wages has been covered from all sides on many occasions, but it didn’t stop it from coming up in this debate too, with one commenter writing, “regardless [of] if wages have increased, everything else has increased twice as much.”</p> <p>It led to the older members of the group circling back to a tired argument, too. One was determined to stop that line of argument in its tracks, suggesting that they’d been able to afford their home with the higher rates because they didn’t purchase takeaway coffee and “only ate out occasionally”.</p> <p>This wasn’t to be taken lying down, with the younger generation refusing to allow that buying the occasional little treat was the reason they couldn’t get a foot in the door of their own home. </p> <p>One member, perhaps realising that bickering wasn’t going to get them anywhere, decided to whip out a calculator and get to the bottom of it all. </p> <p>Someone wrote that they paid $44k for a 3 bedroom home in 1986, with a yearly income of $31k behind them, before allowing that “maybe things weren't so tough”.</p> <p>“If adjusted for inflation,” one said in response, before sharing their maths, “your income today would be $92k pa and the price you paid for your house would have been $131k.”</p> <p>While both generations faced struggles with the property market, the challenges faced in 2023 are an entirely new beast, and one member of Perth Reflects shared their sympathy over the situation. </p> <p>After explaining that they struggled through a 17.5 per cent interest rate themselves, they outlined the difference in their situation and their kids’, writing “my home loan was way less than what my kids are paying today”. </p> <p>They bought land and built a house in High Wycombe on a loan of around $130k, and noted that it can be difficult - if not impossible - find a deal like that in even a country town, where prices tend to err on the ‘cheaper’ side of the scale. </p> <p>“Wages are different,” they surmised, “but housing affordability has gone stupid and wages [have] not [been] increased accordingly.”</p> <p><em>Images: Getty, Facebook</em></p>

Money & Banking

Placeholder Content Image

Steve Price clashes with Picasso protestors

<p>Steve Price has clashed with a climate protestor who glued his hand to a Picasso painting in Melbourne's National Gallery of Victoria. </p> <p>Police were called to the gallery on Sunday after two protesters stuck themselves to Picasso’s <em>Massacre in Korea</em>, which was being exhibited as part of The Picasso Century program.</p> <p>Climate change activist group Extinction Rebellion claimed responsibility for the protest in a video of the incident, which was live-streamed on Facebook.</p> <p>The video showed two protesters unfurling a flag which read “Climate Chaos = War + Famine”.</p> <p>“We are in a climate, ecological crisis,” a female protester said with her left hand stuck to the painting.</p> <p>Appearing on The Project on Monday, one of the protesters – retired teacher Tony Gleeson – said the purpose of their actions was to raise awareness about climate change. </p> <p>However, Steve Price wasn't buying his arguments, and said the group's logic behind the protest was flawed. </p> <p>“Why wouldn’t you go and glue your silly hand to a power station rather than a painting in a gallery when that painting is worth so much money?” Price asked.</p> <p>Mr Gleeson insisted he was never going to damage the painting because it was protected by a perspex shield. </p> <div> <div id="aniBox"> <div id="aniplayer_AV62af35d851923c62777207b4-1665442990706"> <div id="aniplayer_AV62af35d851923c62777207b4-1665442990706gui"></div> </div> </div> </div> <p>“We knew beforehand that painting was covered and it was carefully planned, we knew that it was covered and we knew that there was no chance of it being damaged,” Mr Gleeson said.</p> <p>“You can frame that whichever way you want, and you will. It’s your job to be provocative like that but I’m not going to wear it.”</p> <p>Price said he was “just being honest” and “speaking for the majority of people who don’t want vandals sticking their hands on perplex covering a Picasso with glue”.</p> <p>“They would rather if you want to protest, go and do that somewhere else,” he added.</p> <p>Mr Gleeson said his radical group had plans to do exactly that over in coming weeks. </p> <p>“Yeah, great,” Price replied, sarcastically.</p> <p><em>Image credits: The Project</em></p>

TV

Placeholder Content Image

Chris Dawson’s brothers clash with media

<p dir="ltr">The brothers of convicted murderer Chris Dawson have clashed with media outside the court where their brother received his guilty verdict.</p> <p dir="ltr">NSW Supreme Court Justice Ian Harrison <a href="https://www.oversixty.com.au/news/news/stunning-chris-dawson-verdict-handed-down" target="_blank" rel="noopener">found the 74-year-old former Rugby player guilty</a> of murdering his wife Lynette in January 1982, bringing the high-profile trial to an end.</p> <p dir="ltr">Lynette was 33 when she vanished from the family’s Bayview home, and her body has never been found. Dawson pleaded not guilty during the trial and has maintained his innocence.</p> <p dir="ltr">With emotions running high in the wake of the verdict, Dawson’s brothers were seen getting into a scuffle with the media, prompting police to intervene when one brother appeared to nudge a cameraman.</p> <p dir="ltr">“That’s my wife,” one of the brothers said.</p> <p dir="ltr">“I’m trying to get to my wife.”</p> <p dir="ltr">Following the scuffle, members of the media continued to follow the family, though a police officer shielded the woman from them and kept a hand on her back.</p> <p dir="ltr">The brother then hugged his wife, who appeared to be crying, distressed and emotional.</p> <p dir="ltr">No arrests were made as a result of the incident.</p> <p dir="ltr">JC, the family’s teenage babysitter who Dawson married in the years following Lynette’s disappearance, played a significant role in the trial, with Justice Harrison finding that Dawson was obsessed with her when they met while he was a teacher at her high school.</p> <p dir="ltr">The couple built a home near Dawson’s twin brother Paul and his wife Marilyn, three years after Lynette’s disappearance, and had a daughter.</p> <p dir="ltr">The couple split five years later.</p> <p dir="ltr">Dawson’s third wife, Susan, didn’t accompany him to court.</p> <p><span id="docs-internal-guid-41eaca7c-7fff-0d08-17dd-1164c34980a3"></span></p> <p dir="ltr"><em>Image: Getty Images</em></p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

Tracy Grimshaw's head-to-head clash with Scott Morrison

<p>Prime Minister Scott Morrison has copped a sledging from Tracy Grimshaw in a savage <em>A Current Affair</em> interview. </p> <p>In the fiery on-air conversation, the veteran host didn't hold back when she suggested the Prime Minister was not the superhero he suggested he was to voters, and asked him if he “slightly over-egged” his claim that he saved the country.</p> <p>“Prime Minister, you said at your launch on Sunday that you saved the country,’’ she said.</p> <p>“You don’t hold a hose, you weren’t in your tinnie plucking people off rooftops, you weren’t doing 16-hour days in PPE on COVID wards, you didn’t get enough vaccines soon enough, you didn’t get enough RATs so that we could finally have a holiday interstate for Christmas, and China is set up, based in the Solomons,” she said.</p> <p>“Do you think maybe you slightly over egged the part about saving the country?”</p> <p>In response, the Prime Minister responded to the hard-hitting question by saying, “Well, that’s quite a long list you’ve been able to pull together.”</p> <p>“But let me say this, we come out of this pandemic better than almost any other country in the world,’’ he said.</p> <p>“I acknowledge constantly the great resilience and strength of Australians and I backed them in together with Josh Frydenberg and my whole team and that’s how Australia survived, by backing in Australians, and our policies do that. Sure I have my critics, not everything that we did worked perfectly, but I can tell you, when you stack it up Tracy, what we were able to do in Australia compared to the countries around the world, our economic plan has worked.”</p> <p>Tracy then asked the PM about his popularity within the Australian public, especially his dwindling support from women in recent weeks. </p> <p>Grimshaw then asked the PM, “What would you have done differently if you had known that so many Australians were holding a grudge.”</p> <p>“I think I could have certainly been more sensitive at times, there is no doubt about that," he replied.</p> <p><em>Image credits: A Current Affair</em></p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

“Come on, come on”: Karl Stefanovic clashes with ALP President

<p dir="ltr">Karl Stefanovic and the President of the Australian Labor Party have butted heads over Anthony Albanese’s treatment by the media and his latest forgetful moment while facing the press.</p> <p dir="ltr">Wayne Swan told <em><a href="https://9now.nine.com.au/today/anthony-albanese-gaffe-labor-mp-wayne-swan-weighs-in-on-controversy/f5d3c937-39fd-41f0-9c28-ad2f71cde2c9" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Today</a></em> that Mr Albanese needs to be “given a fair go” instead of being the target of “gotcha journalism” and compared his treatment by the press to that of former Prime Minister Julia Gillard. </p> <p dir="ltr">Meanwhile, Stefanovic claimed the future prime minister should be across all the details after Mr Albanese failed to recall his six-point plan for the NDIS.</p> <p dir="ltr">“I just think Australians are being sold short by this kind of ‘gotcha’ journalism,” Swan said.</p> <p dir="ltr">“He was being asked about a press release that was 18 days old. I think the problem we have got here is the Prime Minister is not being subject to the same focus and I also think there is a degree of hostility in the press pack and that’s not helping, it’s not good for democracy and it’s not good for debate.”</p> <p dir="ltr">Karl shot back that if Swan was in the same position he would “definitely remember policy details”.</p> <p dir="ltr">“You can only have so many times you can be asked details - if you want to be prime minister of this country - and I’m telling you right now Wayne Swan, you were across detail - you have to be across a level of it and this was his own policy,” Stefanovic said.</p> <p dir="ltr">“He is across the detail, there is no question about it - but this ‘gotcha’ journalism with the press pack on the road is disgusting,” Swan replied.</p> <p dir="ltr">“Come on, come on, what (about) asking questions of the person who wants to lead the country is disgusting?” Stefanovic asked.</p> <p dir="ltr">“No, demanding dumb answers - that is the problem here. I think the sort of prosecution of Anthony Albanese is now at the level we saw with Julia Gillard and that was a low point in Australian politics,” Swan answered.</p> <p dir="ltr">Swan continued to say that the public “are absolutely fed up with this”, while Stefanovic countered that the public “need to see Albanese perform and be across more of the details”.</p> <p dir="ltr">The debate - and Mr Albanese’s failure to recall - came after he was unable to recall the cash rate or the unemployment rate in the election campaign’s opening days which made him the target of various critics.</p> <p><span id="docs-internal-guid-2e298932-7fff-fda8-ff3d-4a9a41ac9376"></span></p> <p dir="ltr"><em>Images: Today</em></p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

"This is serious stuff": Kochie's on-air clash with PM

<p>Prime Minister Scott Morrison has been involved in an on-air spat with <em>Sunrise</em> host David Koch over Australia's unemployment rate.</p> <p>During a segment, Kochie ended the chat with ScoMo by asking about a “lighthearted story” of a Sydney council threatening not to empty the rubbish of a resident who has plastered anti-ScoMo stickers on his bins.</p> <p>The stickers show Mr Morrison holding a lump of coal in parliament with the phrase "bin him".</p> <p>When the <em>Sunrise</em> host asked the Prime Minister what he thought of the stickers, the PM immediately tried to deflect the question.</p> <p>“I will leave that to the mayor of Hornsby,” Mr Morrison said, before he continued on.</p> <p>“What I’m focused on is ensuring our economic plans continues to work, unemployment down four per cent …,” he said.</p> <p>Koch then spoke over the top of him, saying “yeah yeah yeah”.</p> <p>“No David, not yeah, yeah yeah. This is serious stuff,” Mr Morrison retaliated.</p> <p>Kochie fired back saying, “It is serious, but you’d made the point earlier on that. We’re trying to finish with something a bit light hearted.”</p> <p>“I’ll let him [the Hornsby mayor] deal with taking the bins out. I’ll get on with strengthening the economy,” Mr Morrison said in response.</p> <p>Koch made one parting remark as he farewelled the Prime Minister, saying, “We all have to keep smiling.”</p> <p>Philip Ruddock, the mayor in question from Hornsby Shire Council, defended his council's decision not to empty the bins on Wednesday.</p> <p>He told 2GB that stickers of any form weren’t allowed “on public furniture”.</p> <p>“Political advertising should be done on private property,” he said.</p> <p><em>Image credits: Sunrise</em></p>

TV

Placeholder Content Image

Local woman nearly flips car in clash with anti-vaxxer

<p dir="ltr">Footage of a fed-up local clashing with a ‘Freedom Fighter’ in Canberra <a href="https://www.pedestrian.tv/news/car-crash-canberra-protesters/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">has emerged</a> online, as the huge demonstration against vaccine mandates continues.</p><p dir="ltr">In the clip, which has been viewed 262,000 times, a local Canberra woman, who has since been identified as Chantal-Jasmine Fox, can be seen having a heated exchange with one of the protestors from the car in front.</p><p dir="ltr">“Get the f**k outta Canberra. Go get a job and find something better to do,” Ms Fox can be heard saying from the driver’s seat of her car as the window rolls down, while the protester asks for her licence.</p><p dir="ltr">“You reversed into me,” she says to the protestor filming.</p><blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p dir="ltr" lang="en">holy shit wait for it… <a href="https://t.co/FTUvsb4KVz">pic.twitter.com/FTUvsb4KVz</a></p>— matt (@mattDCLXVI) <a href="https://twitter.com/mattDCLXVI/status/1492667852272259073?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 13, 2022</a></blockquote><p dir="ltr">“Um sorry, we’re at a traffic light and-” the protestor says, before Ms Fox interrupts.</p><p dir="ltr">“Say whatever you like, man. You can put whatever you want sweetheart, the media doesn’t care about you,” she says.</p><p dir="ltr">“I’m not talking to the media,” the protestor replies.</p><p dir="ltr">With their altercation seeming to be over, Ms Fox moves her car to be right next to the protester's car.</p><p dir="ltr">The footage shows Ms Fox’s vehicle slamming the protester’s, with the impact seeing her car almost flip over and land her rear right wheel on the protester’s car bonnet.</p><p dir="ltr">The clip quickly spread across social media, prompting Ms Fox to receive a wave of backlash after she shared the video on her Instagram page.</p><p dir="ltr"><img src="https://oversixtydev.blob.core.windows.net/media/2022/02/screenshots.jpg" alt="" width="1280" height="720" /></p><p dir="ltr"><em>Ms Fox took to Instagram to share examples of the abuse she has been receiving over the incident, as well as footage and images from the scene. Images: @fantastic_miss_foxx (Instagram)</em></p><p dir="ltr">In one screenshot she shared, one person commented, “What do you have to say for yourself”, to which she replied, “Suck my b***s”.</p><p dir="ltr">Another screenshot shared by Ms Fox showed a private message she received through Instagram from a woman who called her a “skank” and told her to “learn some manners!”.</p><p dir="ltr">“These are the kind, rational people at these protests,” Ms Fox said in a follow-up clip.</p><p dir="ltr">In another image she shared, her black 4WD can be seen mounted on the protester’s car.</p><p dir="ltr">“A bit butthurt over an accident,” she wrote over the photo.</p><p dir="ltr">“Antivaxxers = drama.”</p><p dir="ltr">Police have confirmed Ms Fox will be issued an infringement notice for negligent driving, <em><a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10507571/Canberra-road-rage-Covid-protest-screaming-woman-slams-online-trolls.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Daily Mail</a></em> reported.</p><p dir="ltr">The incident is one of several altercations that have occurred in the capital city over the weekend, as thousands of anti-vaxxer protestors known as the Convoy to Canberra gathered outside Federal Parliament.</p><p dir="ltr">Several people <a href="https://www.pedestrian.tv/news/canberra-convoy-anti-vaxxer/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">were arrested</a> after breaking through barricades set up at Parliament House, while Lifeline Canberra’s book fair - a yearly fundraiser and Australia’s biggest book fair - was forced to cancel the event after visitors and volunteers were subject to abuse from protestors.</p><p dir="ltr">Prime Minister Scott Morrison called on the protesters to act “peacefully and respectfully”, saying that vaccine mandates were the responsibility of state governments.</p><p dir="ltr">ACT Police and the management of Exhibition Park in Canberra (EPIC), where protestors have been camping, have advised protestors to leave the grounds by Sunday, February 13.</p><p dir="ltr">“ACT Policing reiterates its support for the rights of individuals to conduct peaceful protests, but visitors camping in the ACT need to do so lawfully,” police said in a <a href="https://www.policenews.act.gov.au/news/media-releases/campers-required-leave-epic-sunday" target="_blank" rel="noopener">statement</a>.</p><p dir="ltr"><em>Images: @mattDCLXVI (Twitter)</em></p>

Travel Trouble

Placeholder Content Image

Huge clash on The Project could see Peter van Onselen ousted

<p>Only days after Peter van Onselen criticised Grace Tame’s viral photo with Prime Minister Scott Morrison, leading to three of his The Project co-hosts slamming him publicly, it seems his future on the show could be up in the air.</p><p><br />Former TV executive Rob McKnight has questioned whether Ten's political editor will return to the show after being involved in such an explosive clash with his co-hosts.<br />"I can't see how he can continue on the program," Rob told The Daily Mail.</p><p>The reported rift seemingly kicked off when Peter labelled Grace "ungracious, rude and childish" in a column for The Australian on Tuesday. Video and photos of Grace refusing to look at ScoMo and appearing visibly uncomfortable at the 2022 Australian of the Year Finalists Morning Tea at The Lodge in Canberra on Tuesday morning quickly went viral, with Peter questioning why she felt the need to be so rude to the PM.</p><p><br />While he praised her advocacy for sexual abuse survivors, he was left unimpressed by her refusal to smile for photos. This statement led him to being slammed on air by co-host Carrie Bickmore and guest Amy Remeikis.</p><p><br />Lisa Wilkinson, who is rumoured to dislike Peter, later shared an Instagram post applauding Grace for 'making noise' while Australian of the Year.<br />Tommy Little later slammed Peter during his radio show on Thursday, calling his op-ed 'stupid'.</p><p><br />"I can't see how he can continue on the show when Lisa and Carrie have turned on him publicly. Will he want to work with them? Will they want to work with him? I can't imagine it's a comfortable place for him to be when he's sitting at that desk," he said, also suggesting the producers of the show threw Peter 'under the bus'.</p><p><br />Rob added that while hosts disagreeing can make for good TV, this 'seemed personal'.<br />In Peter's opinion piece he took aim at Grace, writing, "If your disdain for the man is so great (understandable perhaps) that you can’t even muster basic and common courtesy, then just don't go."</p><p>When he later appeared on The Project, it became clear it hadn't gone down well with Carrie Bickmore and Amy Remeikis.</p><p><br />Lisa Wilkinson later shared a lengthy Instagram post thanking Grace for all her work, writing, "Thank you Grace. Thank you for always speaking your truth. Thank you for never wavering from your passionate fight for justice for survivors of sexual assault."<br />"Thank you for doing everything within your power to make sure over the last 12 months that those in charge were listening, and acting on much-needed change."</p><p><br />She thanked Grace for her tireless campaigning, adding, "Grace, the imprint you leave as Australian Of The Year will be felt for generations to come."<br />"Finally, and most importantly Grace, thank you for making noise… just like you promised you would."</p><p><em>Image: The Project</em></p>

TV

Placeholder Content Image

"Karen" caught on camera threatening fisherman

<p>A woman in the elite suburb of Birchgrove has been caught on video threatening a fisherman at Balmain Rowing Club by calling the police after a fish he caught died.</p> <p>Footage of the conflict was posted to YouTube on New Year's Eve and has been viewed almost 150,000 times.</p> <p>The woman has been labelled a "Karen", a popular term to describe people who often complain.</p> <p>The exchange, which occurred on a pier in Sydney's inner west, began when the young fisherman, who goes by the name Shroom on social media, was pulling on his fishing rod.</p> <p>A caption on the film says: “Despite my best efforts to release a fish that I caught it ended up floating later”.</p> <p>The middle-aged woman then walked up to Shroom and asks: “Why did you just kill that fish, and throw it back in and kill it?”</p> <p>Shroom says “I didn’t kill it,” to which the woman replies “you did so”.</p> <p>“I saw it and it’s floating, here,” she says, pointing past him.</p> <p>Shroom: “I tried to release it, but it didn’t release. I did not kill it.”</p> <p>Woman: “You did. I saw it here and it was flapping up and around. You’ve got a hide. Can I see your fishing licence please?”</p> <p>The woman then proceeds to film him on her phone.</p> <p>Shroom tells her he does have a fishing licence and that he will put her “on YouTube as well”, to which she says, “that’s okay”.</p> <p>“There’s nothing wrong that I’ve done, absolutely nothing wrong. I know my rules and …,” Shroom says as he reels in his line.</p> <p>The woman points and interrupts him as Shroom says, “that’s okay, that’s okay you can call the DPI now if you want, the Department of Primary Industries, you can give them a call”.</p> <p>The woman nods, and adds “and Balmain Police” and walks off back down the pier.</p> <p>He yells out at her, “you can do that”, to which she replies, “I will, I am, don’t you worry about it”.</p> <p>Viewers flocked to the comments to praise Shroom on his calm and collected response.</p> <p>“You handled that well mate. Some people just don’t have a clue,” one person said.</p> <p>Another wrote: “Some people just don’t get it mate. Handled well – be polite, let them call police or whatever. You knew you were in the right so may as well keep fishing.”</p> <p>Another posted: “Don’t understand what she’s trying to achieve … She’s gonna call the police &amp; say ‘old mate was fishing &amp; he released the fish but it died?!’ Cops will laugh at her.”</p> <p>One commenter joked, “she was saltier than the fish you just released. And gutted she could not ask to speak to your manager”.</p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

“I was there on the ground”: Former commando in fiery clash with media

<p>Former special forces commando Heston Russell has hit back at an ABC journalist over alleged war crimes, challenging the media to define “heat of battle”.</p> <p>During a fiery press conference in Canberra, Mr Russell challenged journalists over the Brereton Report.</p> <p>He insisted that soldiers had a right to the presumption of innocence.</p> <p>“Isn’t the lowest of the low, the most unAustralian act, the fact that we had special forces soldiers, in Australia’s name, murdering at least 39 innocents?,’’ the ABC’s political editor Andrew Probyn asked.</p> <p>The former special forces officer lashed out at Mr Probyn, accusing Australia of running a trial by media.</p> <p>“The lowest of the low is that you continue to stand here and accuse them of crimes … that must stand in court,’’ he said.</p> <p>“I was there on the ground. I did not see these things. If any of you were on the ground, please feel free to speak up.</p> <p>“So, here today we are saying that the allegations are shocking, are confronting and if proven are unAustralian. But what is unAustralian is not affording the due process.</p> <p>“We want due process afforded and we want the Australian public to know what’s going on.”</p> <p>As the press conference continued, Mr Russell demanded the name of Probyn.</p> <p>“What’s your name?” he said, to which Probyn responded: “Andrew.”</p> <p>“Andrew, what is the heat of battle?,’’ he asked.</p> <p>“Well, I am quoting the report and this is also something that has been made clear by the CDF (the chief of defence force) and the minister,’’ the journalist said.</p> <p>Mr Russell and Ms Lambie asked Probyn again: “So, what is the heat of battle?”</p> <p>“So, when I went out on operations, we went on operations to catch an insurgent …’’ Mr Russell said.</p> <p>However the journalist quickly jumped in and said: “you asked me a question, one of the alleged murders is captured on film” and added that in the footage someone was shot at point blank range.</p> <p>“That doesn’t look like the heat of battle.”</p> <p>Mr Russell said that members of the special forces were required to go out and prosecute targets on a list.</p> <p>“The Americans and the British would drop bombs on these people, we would not afford the collateral damage. So, we sent out soldiers out there to capture and kill them and under legal authority could have done so in any circumstances.</p> <p>“That situation is particular is indeed an allegation that I am going to afford the presumption of innocence.</p> <p>“I was not there and it is not right for me to comment. Unless you were there, and understand the heat of battle I am not going to dive into opinions.”</p> <p>Mr Russell was then asked if the rules of engagement allowed for special forces to kill anyone which he responded was not the case.</p> <p>“No. So, the rules of engagement were if someone was classified on the JPEL (Joint Priorities Effect List) as being a known terrorist insurgent we had an authority from back in the headquarters to drop a bomb on them or send a team out to kill or capture them,’’ Mr Russell said.</p> <p>The Brereton inquiry report has revealed there have allegedly been 39 unlawful killings of prisoners and civilians by Australian soldiers in Afghanistan.</p> <p>The Chief of Defence Force has said that none of the alleged killings occurred in the heat of battle.</p> <p>19 personnel have been referred for criminal investigation.</p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

Jeff Kennett clashes with Project hosts over Vic lockdown

<p>Former Victorian Premier Jeff Kennett let his true feelings be known on <em>The Sunday Project </em>after he compared Daniel Andrews' lockdown to a "communist state" and referred to residents as "hostages".</p> <p>He clashed with host Peter Van Onselen during a tense TV argument as the other hosts watched on.</p> <p>“You’re very lucky because you’ve still got a job," the former Premier bitterly told Van Onselen.</p> <p>The hosts asked whether it mattered if the state was in lockdown for a few more months after it was already subjected to strict rules.</p> <p>Mr Kennett did not hold back.</p> <p>“Yes, it does because the Premier only two days ago gave an indication that a lot of our small businesses would be able to reopen from the middle of next week, so therefore that doesn’t happen instantaneously,” he began.</p> <p>“People have started to clean the places, hire staff, order in food, etc. But the worst thing is we’ve had seven new cases today – seven.</p> <p>“We have a population of 6.4 million people. And for seven cases, 6.4 million people are continued to be held hostage by this Premier.</p> <p>“NSW some days now have recorded more cases than us, and not only are they able to continue to trade, but they have no rings of steel. We have 5km radiuses which are now 25.</p> <p>“This is a – this is a Communist state.”</p> <p><em>The Sunday Project</em> co-host Lisa Wilkinson tried to calm down Mr Kennett's rage, but it was to no avail.</p> <p>Wilkinson suggested that NSW had handled the pandemic better due to better contact tracing, but Kennett refused to believe it.</p> <p>“Yes, but how long have we had this virus?” Mr Kennett countered. “How long have we had contact tracing problems here in Victoria? Why haven’t they been addressed if they are the problem?</p> <div class="embed-responsive embed-responsive-16by9"><iframe class="embed-responsive-item" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/zsd7dKNp8nU"></iframe></div> <p>“I’m not arguing that it may be the problem, but if it is the problem, why has it taken months to get it right? We have a government – and if they can’t govern, if the Premier can’t lead, get out of the way and let someone else come in and do the job for him.”</p> <p>Comedian and co-host Tommy Little tried his best to lighten the mood and asked Kennett what he would have done if he was still Premier.</p> <p>“Firstly, we wouldn’t be in this situation if I was still premier because I would never have allowed the mismanagement of the hotel quarantine that started this second wave,” Mr Kennett stated.</p> <p>“Where there is an outbreak, as they did in Tasmania, where they’ve done in NSW, where they’ve done in Queensland – you address the problem, but you do not lock down the state for the best part of a year.”</p> <p>“People have died, people are losing their income and their businesses, and unfortunately many in the community say, ‘Well, isn’t this wonderful?’ he continued.</p> <p>“Because what we are doing is avoiding what’s happening in Europe and in the US but we are not in Europe, we are not in the US.</p> <p>“Victoria should be comparing itself with NSW, Queensland, Tasmania, Western Australia, etc, and by any similar test, this has been disastrously handled and the corruption in the failure of the government and its ministers and public servants to be honest, with the community they lead, only compounds the problem.</p> <p>“So often is the case. It’s not the original mistakes that have become the major issue, it’s the cover-up that continues to this day.”</p> <p>Van Onselen tried to steer the interview on course, saying that he agreed with Kennett's concerns, but saying that it was comparable to "communism" was too far.</p> <p>“I think I probably agree with a lot of your concerns and I can understand the anger from a lot of Victorians, but I’m not sure that the inflated rhetoric about Communism and all these sort of things helps people who are on the fence just wondering what should happen?” he said.</p> <p>“Well, Peter, how would you describe it? We’re locked down,” he raged. “We’ve had curfews. We can’t travel around our state. Businesses can’t open, and they are all decisions of one man.</p> <p>“Alright, I accept Communism – a bit over the top, but it is a dictatorship.</p> <p>“He doesn’t listen to people in his own party. He doesn’t listen to business community and health officials. He is making these decisions on his own, and I guess, Peter, all I’m saying is this can’t go on without there being years of damage, both to the mental welfare of a lot of our community, but also to our economy.</p> <p>“Now, alright, maybe I went over the top with ‘Communism’ but this is a dictatorship. I’ve never seen anything like it, and there has never been anything replicated in any other part of the world in dealing with this virus, so what would you call it?”</p> <p>This only angered Kennett.</p> <p>“800 people who have died. There are hundreds of people, families, small businessmen who have lost their income and their financial security and what did you describe it as?”</p> <p>“Over the top,” said van Onselen.</p> <p>Back to Mr Kennett: “Over the top – well, you’re very lucky because you’ve still got a job. Over the top. You keep drawing your salary, my friend. You are very, very fortunate.</p> <p>“I tell you what, there are a lot of people here in Victoria who will never ever recover from the way we’ve handled this virus. It should never have been about elimination It should always been about manage it, like you’ve done in NSW.”</p> <p>In wrapping up, van Onselen was eager to wrap up the segment, quickly thanking Kennett for his time.</p> <p> “Jeff, I think a lot of people understand your frustration. We appreciate your time.”</p> <p>Mr Kennett sarcastically replied, “It was a great pleasure. I was just passing by.”</p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

Pete Helliar and Steve Price locked in bitter clash over lockdown laws

<div class="body_text "> <p><em>The Project</em> hosts have been clashing after an intense discussion over Melbourne's lockdown laws.</p> <p>The discussion came after co-host Carrie Bickmore read out an article around coronavirus fines in Melbourne for excess guests.</p> <p>“Ten parties (in Melbourne) over the weekend; one of them had 40 people. Now, 40’s obviously over the top, but would you dob in someone who had half a dozen people over at their house for a barbecue?” asked Price.</p> <p>Helliar’s response was immediate: “I wouldn’t think twice about it.”</p> <p>“Really? You’re a dobber? You’re a dobber. It’s unAustralian, Peter,” Price pushed.</p> <p>“Mate, I don’t care. That’s bulls**t,” Helliar shot back, as Price repeated his “unAustralian” claim.</p> <p>“You can say it again if you want – I’ll say the same thing,” Helliar continued. “Haven’t you been paying attention to what we’ve all been going through? We’re so close to the end. The fact that 40 people are like-minded enough to think that it’s OK to have a party is ridiculous.”</p> <p>Bickmore had advice for Price, with her suggesting that he sits in a park if he wants a small gathering.</p> <p>“Well what’s the difference between sitting in a park or sitting in my backyard?”</p> <p>“Because that’s what you’re allowed to do!” said an exasperated Bickmore.</p> <p>Host Waleed Aly took control and asked if Price was planning to host an illegal house party.</p> <p>“Yes! I am! Yes! … Let me be clear, I’m not encouraging people to break the law. I’m saying, don’t dob them in.”</p> <p>Fans of the show didn't agree with him.</p> <p><a rel="noopener" href="https://twitter.com/RichardTuffin/status/1310501560523214850" target="_blank">https://twitter.com/RichardTuffin/status/1310501560523214850</a></p> <p><a rel="noopener" href="https://twitter.com/Dicentraspect/status/1310553805906345984" target="_blank">https://twitter.com/Dicentraspect/status/1310553805906345984</a></p> <p><a rel="noopener" href="https://twitter.com/christine_w86/status/1310501504806129664" target="_blank">https://twitter.com/christine_w86/status/1310501504806129664</a></p> </div>

News

Placeholder Content Image

Pauline Hanson clashes with Karl Stefanovic on Today

<p>Pauline Hanson and Karl Stefanovic have clashed over the Federal Government’s new coronavirus tracing app during a heated segment on the<span> </span><em>Today<span> </span></em>show.</p> <p>The COVIDSafe app, which is now live, is designed to help authorities track people who may have come across an infected person, but so far, it’s been proven controversial, sparking privacy and security concerns.</p> <p>Using Bluetooth technology, COVIDSafe keeps a list of other users you’re been within 1.5m of more than 15 minutes.</p> <p>Over one million Aussies have downloaded the app so far, but others are hesitant, including Hanson citing mistrust in the government.</p> <p>When questioned about her stance by Stefanovic this morning, Hanson was blunt.</p> <p>“I don’t want them tracking me. I don’t trust the Government,” she said, before citing the data retention laws of 2015 and claiming this latest app would also wind up passing personal information into the hands of other companies.</p> <p>“Why the hell would I let the Government give it to them personally to download my information?” Senator Hanson questioned, causing Stefanovic to fire back with a reminder about civic duty.</p> <p>“You have a responsibility to the Australian people if we want to try and control this COVID-19 and we want to try to track people,” he told her.</p> <p>But Hanson was adamant that she hadn’t been in contact with anyone who was infected.</p> <p>“I have a responsibility to myself first and foremost. I know damn well that I haven't been around people,” she insisted.</p> <p>“I've been self-isolating. I haven't got the COVID-19, besides when you have only a few cases in the blasted country and they lockdown the whole bloody country still and they want to put this app on your phone when we're on very much on the decrease … Come on, Karl. I don’t trust them.”</p> <p>A laughing Stefanovic then joked that anyone tracking his movements would likely find them underwhelming.</p> <p>“They’re going to track me – let me tell you where I go. I go to work. I go home. I go to Woolies. I go home. I go to work. I go home … That’s my whole life,” he admitted.</p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

No fresh air: Today show hosts clash with young mum in hotel quarantine

<p>An Australian mum in isolation with her young sons at a Brisbane hotel came head-to-head with the hosts of <em>Today </em>show in a tense interview.</p> <p>Sarah Greig and her two sons were placed in quarantine at the Novotel Hotel in Brisbane after arriving from Jakarta on Sunday. The family will remain in mandatory isolation for two weeks.</p> <p>Greig told hosts Allison Langdon and Karl Stefanovic she and other travellers stuck in the same situation are unable to access fresh air or go outside.</p> <p>“I think the best thing for us right now is for the Australian public to understand that nobody is complaining about conditions of the hotel,” Greig said.</p> <p>“We’ve got fresh, clean sheets, we’ve got running water, all of those things are fantastic but we don’t have access to fresh air.</p> <p>“We just want a solution to be able to get access to sunlight and fresh air. I don’t think that’s being unreasonable in any way, shape or form. I certainly don’t think that that makes us whingers.”</p> <p>Greig added that she would welcome safety measures such as wearing protective clothing while outside.</p> <p>“I would wear a garbage bag over my body to be allowed some fresh air and sunlight right now. I am very concerned about that, don’t get me wrong, but there has got to be a solution to us going outside.”</p> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"> <p dir="ltr">There is growing anger among the thousands of Aussies forced into isolation in hotels around the country, with some saying they're being treated like prisoners. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/9Today?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#9Today</a> <a href="https://t.co/ccPRPDBQb1">pic.twitter.com/ccPRPDBQb1</a></p> — The Today Show (@TheTodayShow) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheTodayShow/status/1245450097007243271?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 1, 2020</a></blockquote> <p>Langdon said self-isolation is a “price worth paying” for overseas travellers to help limit the spread of the coronavirus.</p> <p>“Unfortunately, we’re in the middle of a global pandemic. This the price you and the boys unfortunately have to pay which is two weeks in self-isolation but in the grand scheme of things, if this means keeping everyone healthy, is it not a price worth paying?” Langdon said.</p> <p>Greig responded, “I was asked to come on air today to speak to you about finding solutions to get us some fresh air. That was what I was coming on air to speak to you about today, not to whinge about any of the things you just said to me.”</p> <p>More than 5,000 returning overseas travellers are under quarantine in hotels and accommodation around the country.</p> <p>The measure was started on Saturday by the National Cabinet.</p> <p>NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller said he is working to <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-01/coronavirus-thousands-australians-quarantined-hotel-rooms-travel/12111970">address the concerns raised by those under hotel isolation</a>. “I know there are people who are posting on social media their dissatisfaction … some complaints are reasonable and we will deal with those,” he said.</p> <p>“We shouldn’t frame everyone in these hotels as people who are ungrateful because it certainly is not the case.”</p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

“It’s all a beat up”: Karl Stefanovic’s tense clash with Scott Morrison

<p>The Prime Minister has rejected claims by an outspoken Liberal colleague that senior frontbench MPs are tired of his failure to act on climate change.</p> <p>But Scott Morrison refuted those claims which were made by NSW Environment Minister Matt Kean as “a beat up” during his appearance on the<span> </span><em>Today</em><span> </span>show this morning.</p> <p>“It’s all a beat up,” he said.</p> <p>Mr Kean who is actively trying to reduce the aggressive emissions target for the NSW Government, told<span> </span><em>Sky News on Sunday</em><span> </span>that Morrison is outnumbered within his own party.</p> <p>“I don’t think it’s just moderates that want more action when it comes to reducing our emissions, I think it’s people right across the party,” Kean told host Sharri Markson.</p> <p>“It’s not just moderates that have been breathing in the smoke. It’s not just moderates that have seen the ash falling out of the sky. It’s not just moderates that have seen the devastating impacts these bushfires have had on people, property and our beautiful, natural environment,” he said.</p> <p>“There is widespread support for the Prime Minister to take strong action when it comes to climate change and I understand a group of moderate MPs, and MPs right across the party, from different states, different factions, all want to see decisive and responsible action.”</p> <p>Mr Kean said “some of the most senior members of the government” were turning on the PM and that Morrison should look at the UK where “Boris Johnson … is leading the world when it comes to climate change”.</p> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en-gb"> <p dir="ltr">“The country has been burning. We now have floods, we now have horrific dust storms. Homes have been lost, we’ve lost lives. The country is grieving.” <a href="https://twitter.com/karlstefanovic?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@karlstefanovic</a> on Scott Morrison facing calls from within his own party to do more to take action on climate change. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/9Today?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#9Today</a> <a href="https://t.co/h1bJ3Oirpx">pic.twitter.com/h1bJ3Oirpx</a></p> — The Today Show (@TheTodayShow) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheTodayShow/status/1218997843903635457?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">19 January 2020</a></blockquote> <p>But when Morrison was asked to address the rumours, he quickly shut them down.</p> <p>“Do you see it as a problem that even your own party is not happy with your stand?” Asked Karl Stefanovic.</p> <p>“I don’t accept that position at all,” said Morrison.</p> <p>“Our party’s taken a unified position on these issues to the last election. I will keep to it. We will meet and beat our emissions reductions targets. Emissions are falling under our target.</p> <p>“We know the summers are longer, hotter, dryer. We are addressing them. We acknowledge the link between these things and will have a balanced policy which doesn’t put people out of their jobs.</p> <p>But Stefanovic was just getting started.</p> <p>“If I can put it this way, the country has been burning,” he told the Prime Minister.</p> <p>“We now have floods. We now have these horrific dust storms. Homes have been lost. We’ve lost lives. And country is grieving. Farmers are shooting their own cattle. They can’t put food on the table. I think there is a perception right of wrong you aren’t leading the country on climate change.</p> <p>“People aren’t satisfied with what you’re doing. Are you not concerned in any way, shape of form, that you are out of step with what everyday Australians are thinking and feeling during this crisis?”</p> <p>The pair spoke over each other during what started becoming a tense interview.</p> <p>“Longer, hotter, dryer summers and all the things that you mentioned are the terrible experience we’ve had and we can expect these sort of conditions into the future,” said Morrison.</p> <p>“I think there’s a lot of misinformation out there Karl. For example, we will reduce our carbon emissions per capita by half between now and 2030. We are leading the world on renewable investments in technology and energy in this country. There are the facts Karl.</p> <p>“People don’t want me to take reckless policies which threatens people’s jobs. That’s why we’re meeting and beating the emissions reduction targets. Emissions coming down. Investments and renewable technology is up.”</p> <p>Stefanovic then asked whether the comments Kean made were true.</p> <p>“No,” he replied.</p> <p>“Not at all?”</p> <p>“No, I don’t know what he’s talking about.”</p> <p>“So he’s … are you dismissing what he’s saying?”</p> <p>“I don’t know what he’s talking about. I think Matt should focus on hazard reduction and I will focus on emissions reduction.”</p> <p>“You are not worried about your own party at all? You aren’t worried about rats in the ranks?”</p> <p>“No, it’s all a beat up.”</p>

Travel Trouble

Placeholder Content Image

Karl Stefanovic’s fiery clash with Peter Dutton over $100 million scandal

<p>Fury continues to mount over the government’s sports funding scandal, with Peter Dutton coming up with an unconvincing defence as he faced Karl Stefanovic on breakfast television.</p> <p>A damning report this week from the Auditor-General exposed the “biased” operation of a $100 million grants scheme that was manipulated a day before the election to funnel cash into marginal seats the Coalition desperately needed to win.</p> <p>The minister for sport at the time, Bridget McKenzie disregarded advice from Sports Australia and decided to carve out her own process to award 684 payments in a manner that favoured knife-edge seats the government needed to win or was targeting.</p> <p>Dutton appeared on the<span> </span><em>Today</em><span> </span>show this morning to defend the disgraced senator, saying she should not be sacked and insisted that no rules had been broken.</p> <p>“That’s not the point,” Stefanovic fired back. “The point is that nine of the ten electorates awarded the most money were either marginal seats or ones the Coalition were hoping to win.</p> <p>“I mean, that’s a damning figure. That is pork-barrelling of the highest order. It’s been stacked.”</p> <p>An investigation uncovered that over 60 per cent of projects that received funding were not recommended by Sports Australia under the existing selection criteria.</p> <p>“Applications from projects located in those electorates were more successful in being awared funding that if funding was allocated on the basis of merit assessed against the published program guidelines,” found Auditor-General Grant Hehir.</p> <p>Furthermore, the applicants that Sports Australia did recommend was ignored, with Senator McKenzie’s office running its own “assessments”, revealed the audit.</p> <p>“The important point is that the money has gone out, not against recommendations, not to clubs that weren’t deserving of it,” said Dutton.</p> <p>But that statement contradicts what the Auditor-General had found, regarding Sports Australia’s recommendations being ignored by Senator McKenzie.</p> <p>Stefanovic slammed the process as “just not fair” and highlighted the importance of an integrity and corruption body at a federal level.</p> <p>“She’s done something wrong here and something needs to be done about her behaviour,” he said.</p>

News

Our Partners