Placeholder Content Image

Up to 40% of bushfires in parts of Australia are deliberately lit. But we’re not doing enough to prevent them

<div class="theconversation-article-body"> <p><em><a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/nichola-tyler-938790">Nichola Tyler</a>, <a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/swinburne-university-of-technology-767">Swinburne University of Technology</a> and <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/troy-mcewan-116967">Troy McEwan</a>, <a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/swinburne-university-of-technology-767">Swinburne University of Technology</a></em></p> <p>A recent bushfire in Kadnook, western Victoria, which destroyed at least one property and burned more than 1,000 hectares of land, is being investigated due to <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-11-19/arson-chemists-investigate-blaze-that-destroyed-home/104621628">suspicion it was deliberately lit</a>.</p> <p>This is not an isolated example. About 28% of bushfires in south-east Australia are <a href="https://www.publish.csiro.au/wf/wf15054">deliberately lit</a>. The figure rises to 40% if we’re only talking about fires with a known cause.</p> <p>These figures are consistent with <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969722074204">international trends</a> and tell us preventing arson and unsafe fire behaviour alone could significantly reduce the number of bushfires.</p> <p>Despite this, prevention of deliberately lit bushfires is mostly absent from emergency, public health and climate action plans.</p> <h2>These fires are devastating</h2> <p>Deliberately lit bushfires can spread rapidly and have devastating consequences. They often occur <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13218719.2011.598633?casa_token=tHnKrSSDFyIAAAAA%3AVKBGpknNEYOUPMI6IPRI3GRgkUQneXo_Edy1NeAaLlpmk1xmvwkrFKzJW20ZDvE23A41rFbBMuIn">on the edge of urban areas</a> close to populated places, where there are both dense vegetation and flammable structures.</p> <p>We see a peak in bushfires during summer when hot temperatures, low rainfall, and dry conditions make fire a more potent threat.</p> <p>Climate change, land management practices, and increased interaction between people and rural areas increase our vulnerability to fire and the risks associated with deliberate fires.</p> <p>The royal commission into Victoria’s devastating Black Saturday fires in 2009 <a href="http://royalcommission.vic.gov.au/finaldocuments/summary/PF/VBRC_Summary_PF.pdf">reported</a> 173 people died and an additional <a href="https://www.cfa.vic.gov.au/about-us/history-major-fires/major-fires/black-saturday-2009">414 were injured</a>. The commission concluded at least three of the 15 fires that caused (or had the potential to cause) the greatest harm were deliberately lit.</p> <p>The commission concluded we need to better understand arson. It recommended research to improve how best to prevent arson and how to detect who’s at risk of offending.</p> <p>Nearly 15 years on from Black Saturday, these recommendations have not been implemented. There is also very limited evidence globally about how to prevent both bushfire arson and deliberately lit fires more broadly (for instance, fires set to structures or vehicles).</p> <h2>Who lights these fires?</h2> <p>We know little about the characteristics and psychology of people who light bushfires or how to intervene to prevent these fires.</p> <p>The little research we have suggests there is no one “profile” or “mindset” associated with deliberately lighting bushfires.</p> <p>But there are some risk factors or <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13218719.2011.598633?casa_token=83sfFv6u7bkAAAAA%3A_nqjVgizI88CsEzoYBzPR-gYqCoMWtNFwcfKw0ZUqp68uJ6Zbk9ZTu7E_oJ7dpL6RGFUv7m7qHBO#d1e341">vulnerabilities</a> we see more commonly in people who light them. These include:</p> <ul> <li> <p>an interest or fascination with fire or fire paraphernalia. This could include an interest in watching fire, or a fascination with matches or the fire service</p> </li> <li> <p>experiences of social isolation, including a lack of friends or intimate relationships</p> </li> <li> <p>increased impulsivity</p> </li> <li> <p>general antisocial behaviour, such as contact with the police, truanting or property damage</p> </li> <li> <p>difficulties managing and expressing emotions</p> </li> <li> <p>problems with being assertive.</p> </li> </ul> <p>However, most people with these vulnerabilities will never light a fire.</p> <p>Research shows <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0004867413492223">rates of mental illness are higher</a> in people who set fires (including schizophrenia, mood and anxiety disorders, personality dysfunction, and substance use disorders). However, mental health symptoms are <a href="https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315685960-19/role-mental-disorder-firesetting-behaviour-troy-mcewan-lauren-ducat">rarely a direct cause of firesetting</a>. Instead, they appear to worsen existing vulnerabilities.</p> <h2>Why do people light these fires?</h2> <p>There are many, complex reasons why people light fires. Commonly reported drivers <a href="https://www.aic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-05/tandi348.pdf">include</a>: relieving boredom or creating excitement, gaining positive recognition for putting out a fire (they want to be seen as a hero), as a cry for help, or because they’re angry.</p> <p>However, not everyone who lights a fire intends to cause serious damage or harm. In some cases, people may not be aware of the possible consequences of lighting a fire or that the fire may spread into a bushfire.</p> <p>Knowing these kinds of facts about people who light bushfires is important. However, they don’t help us prevent people from lighting fires in the first place. This is because authorities don’t always know who sets the fires.</p> <h2>So how can we prevent this?</h2> <p>First, we can learn more about why people set fires more generally, particularly those who do not attract attention from authorities.</p> <p>Research in the <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010440X0900073X">United States</a>, <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1068316X.2015.1111365">United Kingdom</a> and <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13218719.2024.2346720">New Zealand</a> has started to investigate those who set fires but don’t attract police attention. The aim is to identify ways to prevent people lighting fires in the first place, and support them so they don’t light more.</p> <p>There is almost no research in Australia or internationally into the effects of community awareness, and prevention campaigns or targeted strategies to prevent firesetting, including bushfire arson, in higher risk groups.</p> <p>We know slightly more about interventions to reduce repeat firesetting. <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359178922000246?casa_token=OgEjtCFZfIUAAAAA:Tj-KiUQjvgF1PLR5ZjiHmgWovA83hFT3R6ZyPzWa9F6Gsbje3pJw90AqDqI1pRrvPksTboaJ8w">Fire safety education programs</a> delivered by fire and rescue services show some promise as an early intervention for children and adolescents who have already set a fire, particularly those motivated by curiosity, experimentation, or who are not aware of the consequences.</p> <p>There is also some evidence suggesting <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359178924000351?casa_token=5NtjG6-wIOcAAAAA:95TCYlrBB4dnaqEmd1fnMLmVM6_E8w2n9kCN5aGnIoVr1F1OjfifXULSCnhjWB_GCnStD80_OQ">specialist psychological interventions</a> can be effective in reducing vulnerabilities associated with adult firesetting. Forensic or clinical psychologists typically deliver a combination of cognitive behavioural therapy (a type of talking therapy), skills building (such as building coping skills, emotion and impulse control, and reducing their interest in fire), and fire safety education.</p> <p>However, <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpsy/article/PIIS2215-0366(19)30341-4/fulltext">availability of firesetting interventions is patchy</a> both in Australia and internationally. Interventions that are available are also not always tailored to people with <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13218719.2011.585223#d1e398">complex needs</a>, such as those with significant emotional or behavioural problems or mental health needs. We also don’t know if these interventions lead to a long-term change in behaviour.</p> <h2>Climate change is making this urgent</h2> <p>The continued and escalating effects of climate change makes it more urgent than ever to address the problem of <a href="https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fee.2359">deliberate firesetting, including bushfire arson</a>.</p> <p>Failing to address deliberate firesetting will have significant long-term consequences for public health, human life and the environment.</p> <p>But until funding is available for Australian arson research, identifying and helping people who are more likely to set fires will continue to be based on guesswork rather than evidence.</p> <p>As we enter another summer of high fire danger, our failure to fund arson research should be at the forefront of everyone’s minds.<!-- Below is The Conversation's page counter tag. Please DO NOT REMOVE. --><img style="border: none !important; box-shadow: none !important; margin: 0 !important; max-height: 1px !important; max-width: 1px !important; min-height: 1px !important; min-width: 1px !important; opacity: 0 !important; outline: none !important; padding: 0 !important;" src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/243584/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /><!-- End of code. If you don't see any code above, please get new code from the Advanced tab after you click the republish button. The page counter does not collect any personal data. More info: https://theconversation.com/republishing-guidelines --></p> <p><em><a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/nichola-tyler-938790">Nichola Tyler</a>, Senior Lecturer in Forensic Psychology, <a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/swinburne-university-of-technology-767">Swinburne University of Technology</a> and <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/troy-mcewan-116967">Troy McEwan</a>, Professor of Clinical and Forensic Psychology, <a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/swinburne-university-of-technology-767">Swinburne University of Technology</a></em></p> <p><em>Image credits: Shutterstock</em></p> <p><em>This article is republished from <a href="https://theconversation.com">The Conversation</a> under a Creative Commons license. Read the <a href="https://theconversation.com/up-to-40-of-bushfires-in-parts-of-australia-are-deliberately-lit-but-were-not-doing-enough-to-prevent-them-243584">original article</a>.</em></p> </div>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

Stuff-up or conspiracy? Whistleblowers claim Facebook deliberately let important non-news pages go down in news blackout

<p>On Friday, the Wall Street Journal published information from Facebook whistleblowers, alleging Facebook (which is owned by Meta) deliberately caused havoc in Australia last year <a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-deliberately-caused-havoc-in-australia-to-influence-new-law-whistleblowers-say-11651768302">to influence the News Media Bargaining Code</a> before it was passed as law.</p> <p>During Facebook’s news blackout in February 2021, thousands of non-news pages were also blocked – including important emergency, health, charity and government pages.</p> <p>Meta has continued to argue the takedown of not-for-profit and government pages was a technical error. It remains to be seen whether the whistleblower revelations will lead to Facebook being taken to court.</p> <p><strong>The effects of Facebook’s “error”</strong></p> <p>The <a href="https://theconversation.com/in-a-world-first-australia-plans-to-force-facebook-and-google-to-pay-for-news-but-abc-and-sbs-miss-out-143740">News Media Bargaining Code</a> was first published in July 2020, with a goal to have Facebook and Google pay Australian news publishers for the content they provide to the platforms.</p> <p>It was passed by the House of Representatives (Australia’s lower house) on February 17 2021. That same day, Facebook retaliated by issuing a <a href="https://about.fb.com/news/2021/02/changes-to-sharing-and-viewing-news-on-facebook-in-australia/">statement</a> saying it would remove access to news media business pages on its platform – a threat it had first made in August 2020.</p> <p>It was arguably a reasonable threat of capital strike by a foreign direct investor, in respect to new regulation it regarded as “harmful” – and which it believed fundamentally “misunderstands the relationship between [its] platform and publishers who use it to share news content”.</p> <p>However, the range of pages blocked was extensive.</p> <p>Facebook has a label called the “News Page Index” which can be applied to its pages. News media pages, such as those of the ABC and SBS, are included in the index. All Australian pages on this index were taken down during Facebook’s news blackout.</p> <p>But Facebook also blocked access to other pages, such as the page of the satirical website <a href="https://www.betootaadvocate.com">The Betoota Advocate</a>. The broadness of Facebook’s approach was also evidenced by the blocking of its own corporate page.</p> <p>The <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/feb/18/time-to-reactivate-myspace-the-day-australia-woke-up-to-a-facebook-news-blackout">most major harm</a>, however, came from blocks to not-for-profit pages, including cancer charities, the Bureau of Meteorology and a variety of state health department pages – at a time when they were delivering crucial information about COVID-19 and vaccines.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Whistleblowers emerge</strong></p> <p>The whistleblower material published by the Wall Street Journal, which was also filed to the US Department of Justice and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), includes several email chains that show Facebook decided to implement its blocking threat through a broad strategy.</p> <p>The argument for its broad approach was based on an anti-avoidance clause in the News Media Bargaining Code. The effect of the clause was to ensure Facebook didn’t attempt to avoid the rules of the code by simply substituting Australian news with international news for Australian users. In other words, it would have to be all or nothing.</p> <p>As a consequence, Facebook did not use its News Page Index. It instead classified a domain as “news” if “60% [or] more of a domain’s content shared on Facebook is classified as news”. One product manager wrote:</p> <blockquote> <p>Hey everyone – the [proposed Australian law] we are responding to is extremely broad, so guidance from the policy and legal team has been to be over-inclusive and refine as we get more information.</p> </blockquote> <p>The blocking approach was algorithmic and based on these rules. There were some exceptions, that included not blocking “.gov” – but no such exclusion for “.gov.au”. The effect of this was the taking down of many charity and government pages.</p> <p>The whistleblower material makes it clear a number of Facebook employees offered solutions to the perceived overreach. This included one employee proposal that Facebook should “proactively find all the affected pages and restore them”. However, the documents show these calls were ignored.</p> <p>According to the Wall Street Journal:</p> <blockquote> <p>The whistleblower documents show Facebook did attempt to exclude government and education pages. But people familiar with Facebook’s response said some of these lists malfunctioned at rollout, while other whitelists didn’t cover enough pages to avoid widespread improper blocking.</p> </blockquote> <p><strong>Amendments following the blackout</strong></p> <p>Following Facebook’s news blackout, there were last-minute amendments to the draft legislation before it was passed through the Senate.</p> <p>The main change was that the News Media Bargaining Code would only apply to Facebook if deals were not struck with a range of key news businesses (which so far has not included SBS or <a href="https://twitter.com/ConversationEDU/status/1440562209206128653?s=20&amp;t=FsviAWBLX7mKumr80Qiwzg">The Conversation</a>).</p> <p>It’s not clear whether the amendment was as a result of Facebook’s actions, or if it would have been introduced in the Senate anyway. In either case, Facebook said it was “<a href="https://about.fb.com/news/2021/02/changes-to-sharing-and-viewing-news-on-facebook-in-australia/">satisfied</a>” with the outcome, and ended its news blackout.</p> <p><strong>Facebook denies the accusations</strong></p> <p>The definitions of “core news content” and “news source” in the News Media Bargaining Code were reasonably narrow. So Facebook’s decision to block pages so broadly seems problematic – especially from the perspective of reputational risk.</p> <p>But as soon as that risk crystallised, Facebook denied intent to cause any harm. A Meta spokesperson said the removal of non-news pages was a “mistake” and “any suggestion to the contrary is categorically and obviously false”. Referring to the whistleblower documents, the spokesperson said:</p> <blockquote> <p>The documents in question clearly show that we intended to exempt Australian government pages from restrictions in an effort to minimise the impact of this misguided and harmful legislation. When we were unable to do so as intended due to a technical error, we apologised and worked to correct it.</p> </blockquote> <p><strong>Possible legal action</strong></p> <p>In the immediate aftermath of Facebook’s broad news takedown, former ACCC chair Allan Fels <a href="https://www.news.com.au/technology/online/social/facebook-could-face-lawsuits-for-unconscionable-conduct-over-nonnews-wipe-out/news-story/b312cef33b8e2261e8b5743f9bf87ca6">suggested</a> there could be a series of class actions against Facebook.</p> <p>His basis was that Facebook’s action was unconscionable under the <a href="http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/caca2010265/toc-sch2.html">Australian Consumer Law</a>. We have not seen these actions taken.</p> <p>It’s not clear whether the whistleblower material changes the likelihood of legal action against Facebook. If legal action is taken, it’s more likely to be a civil case taken by an organisation that has been harmed, rather than a criminal case.</p> <p>On the other hand, one reading of the material is Facebook did indeed overreach out of caution, and then reduced the scope of its blocking over a short period.</p> <p>Facebook suffered reputational harm as a result of its actions and apologised. However, if it engaged in similar actions in other countries, the balance between its actions being a stuff up, versus conspiracy, changes.</p> <p>The Wall Street Journal described Facebook’s approach as an “overly broad and sloppy process”. Such a process isn’t good practice, but done once, it’s unlikely to be criminal. On the other hand, repeating it would create a completely different set of potential liabilities and causes of action.</p> <hr /> <p><em>Disclosure: Facebook has refused to negotiate a deal with The Conversation under the News Media Bargaining Code. In response, The Conversation has called for Facebook to be “designated” by the Treasurer under the Code. This means Facebook would be forced to pay for content published by The Conversation on its platform.</em><img style="border: none !important; box-shadow: none !important; margin: 0 !important; max-height: 1px !important; max-width: 1px !important; min-height: 1px !important; min-width: 1px !important; opacity: 0 !important; outline: none !important; padding: 0 !important;" src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/182673/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /></p> <p><em><a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/rob-nicholls-91073" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Rob Nicholls</a>, Associate professor in regulation and governance, <a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/unsw-sydney-1414" target="_blank" rel="noopener">UNSW Sydney</a></em></p> <p><em>This article is republished from <a href="https://theconversation.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Conversation</a> under a Creative Commons license. Read the <a href="https://theconversation.com/stuff-up-or-conspiracy-whistleblowers-claim-facebook-deliberately-let-important-non-news-pages-go-down-in-news-blackout-182673" target="_blank" rel="noopener">original article</a>.</em></p> <p><em>Image: Getty Images</em></p>

Technology

Placeholder Content Image

Unvaccinated singer dies after deliberately catching Covid

<p dir="ltr">The son of a well-known Czech singer who died after catching Covid has spoken out, warning others not to follow his mother’s example.</p> <p dir="ltr">Hana Horka, 57, was a member of Czech folk band Asonance, and had refused to get vaccinated against the virus. After her husband and son, Jan Rek, who are both vaccinated, contracted COVID-19 around Christmas, she refused to isolate from them, instead opting to deliberately contract the virus in order to obtain a Czech health pass, which allows access to public venues for those who can provide proof of vaccination or recent recovery from the virus. Venues such as cinemas, restaurants and bars are currently off-limits to the unvaccinated.</p> <p dir="ltr">Mr Rek told the<span> </span><em>BBC<span> </span></em>his mother died suddenly on Sunday after she had seemingly been on the mend. He said, “She should have isolated for a week because we tested positive. But she was with us the whole time. In about 10 minutes it was all over … She choked to death.</p> <p dir="ltr">“Her philosophy was that she was more OK with the idea of catching Covid than getting vaccinated.”</p> <p dir="ltr">He said that his mother would not listen to family members who tried to persuade her to get the vaccine, and said that he wanted to share his family’s story in an effort to convince others to take Covid seriously, saying, “If you have living examples from real life, it’s more powerful than just graphs and numbers. You can’t really sympathise with numbers.”</p> <p dir="ltr">He added that anti-vaxxers had “blood on their hands”, saying, “I know exactly who influenced her … It makes me sad that she believed strangers more than her proper family.</p> <p dir="ltr">“It wasn’t just total disinformation but also views on natural immunity and antibodies acquired through infection.”</p> <p dir="ltr"><em>Image: Facebook</em></p>

Caring

Placeholder Content Image

Why this dad deliberately ruined his wife's gender reveal plans

<p>Gender reveals have become increasingly popular over the last few years, as well as much more extravagant.</p> <p>One soon-to-be dad wanted to avoid the celebration altogether, by throwing water on his wife's elaborate plans.</p> <p>How did he manage to do that? He decided to post the news on Facebook first, and she's not happy.</p> <p>Taking to Reddit, the man explained the couple already have a two-year-old daughter, who they had a big gender reveal for.</p> <p>"My wife is really into films," he wrote, adding that she loves to ponder over how films are made, which inspired her to make a short gender reveal movie.</p> <p>"Kind of weird but I went along with it," he continued. "We posted it and she was super happy with it but it cost so much."</p> <p>"She hired expensive cameras, we drove out to scenic areas for the right shot, I'm working full time during this process," he said, admitting the whole thing was "exhausting."</p> <p>So when the couple found out they were expecting baby number two, the man was not keen to relive the experience.</p> <p>"We just found out that we're having a boy and she started writing a script," he said. "I thought there's no f---ing way I'm doing that again, so I posted on Facebook 'we're having a boy.'"</p> <p>"She's p---ed at me telling me to delete it but the damage is done," he said, admitting he doesn't feel bad about it. "I saved us at least £4k" ($7000 AUD).</p> <p>"What I don't get is why she's just making films about gender reveals, she can write a script about anything and not be on a strict six to seven-month time limit," he wrote, before asking Redditers if he did the wrong thing.</p> <p>Reddit users were left divided on this one, with many agreeing that although $7000 is a lot of money for a gender reveal, he should have discussed it with his wife before making the announcement.</p> <p>"The adult thing to do would have been to, you know, talk to her and explain that he didn't think it was worth such a huge monetary investment, maybe even brainstorm some cheaper cute ways to announce it," one user wrote. "I would be furious if my husband just slapped something like this up on FB knowing that it was important to me."</p> <p>"I agree with you on gender reveals being ridiculous, and that being way too much money to waste on one, but you don't just kneecap something your partner is this excited about without talking to them first," agreed another. "They both need to work on their communication."</p>

Family & Pets

Placeholder Content Image

“Deliberate acts of kindness”: How COVID has changed customer service expectations

<div class="postIntro"><strong>Reader’s Digest has released the names of the Australian businesses that achieved customer service excellence during an extraordinarily challenging year – while witnessing a “fundamental shift in values”.</strong></div> <p>Taking care of customers has been a monumental task in 2020, and our very best organisations have just been recognised with the naming of the 7th annual Quality Service Awards. These organisations have tapped into an important new level of empathy, with a crucial human touch during the crisis. But the survey to find the winners has also revealed that our own expectations, as customers, have shifted as a response to the challenges of the pandemic.</p> <p>We now put more thought into our choice of products and services, and most of us (67%) are more money conscious since the start of the pandemic.</p> <p>The 2021 Quality Service Awards is an independent survey, conducted by a leading research company, with the awards commissioned by and appearing exclusively in Australian <em>Reader’s Digest</em>. The survey identifies the most satisfied customers across 40 different categories, from Hardware to Holidays and from Supermarkets to Superannuation.</p> <p>“It’s fair to say that something remarkable happened in customer service this year,” notes Australian Reader’s Digest Editor-in-Chief Louise Waterson.</p> <p>“As the full impact and potential dangers of the pandemic became apparent, we saw a fundamental shift in values, with economic considerations taking a back seat to moral responsibility.</p> <p>“At the top, the profit for shareholders was no longer seen as the chief responsibility of doing business. The shift put the community, and individuals, as equally important stakeholders and, as a result, corporations and business turned their focus to see what they could do to share the burden of keeping people safe.”</p> <p>Leading research agency Catalyst Research was commissioned to survey a representative sample of 2,500 Australians, using five key criteria for the survey – including personalisation, understanding, simplicity, satisfaction, and consistency.</p> <p>Two thirds of Australians (67%) say they are more money conscious now since the start of the pandemic, with 63% of Australian consumers acknowledging that they put more thought now into their choice of products and services during the COVID pandemic. A further 58% of Australian consumers would consider the quality of the product and service during the pandemic and they (51%) are more likely to purchase the product or service if it has won an award.</p> <p>Almost half of the Australians surveyed are doing more online shopping now, especially for younger people. The reasons people gave for doing more online shopping include: lockdown, convenience, safety, avoiding crowds.</p> <p>Food, groceries, clothes and shoes are the most common products that people have increased buying online.</p> <p>Men and younger people are more likely to have increased their online shopping across all categories. And 8 in 10 Australians are concerned about the quality of the products or service they purchased online, while three quarters are concerned about fraud.</p> <p>The full list of Australian Quality Service Award winners for 2021 can be seen <a rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.qualityserviceawards.com.au/" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>

Home & Garden

Placeholder Content Image

Family grieve for young mum, partner and baby killed in deliberate house fire

<p><span>The grieving family of a young mum who was killed in a devastating house fire alongside her partner and child, have spoken about their loss at an emotional memorial service.</span><br /><br /><span>Abbey Forrest, 19, partner Inda Sohal, 28, and their three-week-old baby Ivy died in their Point Cook, Melbourne home last Wednesday.</span><br /><br /><span>The news of their death shocked the nation, after it was revealed the horrifying blaze was allegedly deliberately lit.</span></p> <p><img style="width: 500px; height: 281.25px;" src="https://oversixtydev.blob.core.windows.net/media/7839090/fam.jpg" alt="" data-udi="umb://media/d12802484987487bb7a36947c9bdcf21" /><br /><br /><span>Ms Forrest’s parents Alan and Elizabeth attended a memorial dedicated to the young family on Sunday along with dozens of members of the community, who brought balloons, toys and flowers to the site to remember the family.</span><br /><br /><span>A tree has been planted at a nearby park as a way to permanently honour the family, who had only just moved to the neighbourhood.</span><br /><br /><span>Mrs Forrest broke down while talking to 9News, revealing she had only just spoken to the “glowing” and “beautiful” mum just hours before the tragedy.</span><br /><br /><span>“I spoke to her the night before and she said: ‘Love you mum, talk to you tomorrow’,” Mrs Forrest said.</span><br /><br /><span>“Hug your children, because you’re not supposed to bury your children.</span><br /><br /><span>“So give them a hug and let them know that you love them, because you never know when you’ll see them again.”</span><br /><br /><span>Mr Forrest told the Herald Sun the “magic” memorial and support from the community helped his family as they grieve.</span><br /><br /><span>“I’m absolutely amazed by the amount of people and their generosity and support of what happened to my daughter, my granddaughter and future son-in-law,” he said.</span><br /><br /><span>“The amount of people who had that support for us, it’s just amazing.”</span></p> <p><img style="width: 500px; height: 281.25px;" src="https://oversixtydev.blob.core.windows.net/media/7839089/fam-1.jpg" alt="" data-udi="umb://media/c21a999b71394480ac8ca3a024c2e971" /><br /><br /><span>Victoria Police have charged 46-year-old Jenny Hayes with three counts of murder and arson causing death following the fire.</span><br /><br /><span>Abbey’s sister Emily has also set up a GoFundMe to help cover funeral costs and has so far made $31, 116.</span><br /><br /><span>Mr Singh’s parents, who live in India, are planning to hold a traditional ceremony for their son in his homeland.</span><br /><br /><span>“I want to do what we can for all three of these beautiful souls who had their lives tragically cut short,” Emily Forrest wrote on the fundraising page.</span></p> <p><img style="width: 500px; height: 281.25px;" src="https://oversixtydev.blob.core.windows.net/media/7839088/fam-2.jpg" alt="" data-udi="umb://media/ec82128aea4646ceb218fce1da0da652" /><br /><br /><span>Ms. Hayes is a sex worker who was not known to the young family.</span><br /><br /><span>She was visiting a man staying in the downstairs portion of their family townhouse.</span><br /><br /><span>She allegedly lit a mattress on fire after the pair argued over sexual services.</span><br /><br /><span>“As you are all aware, this has now been confirmed it was a deliberately lit fire and a 46yo woman has been taken into custody,” she posted.</span><br /><br /><span>“A big thank you to the emergency services who tried to save them, neighbours who attended that night and did their best, and all of those who have sent their sympathies and condolences whether you be family, friends or strangers.</span><br /><br /><span>“The community we are in is amazing and my family and I are beyond grateful for the help and support you have given and offered.”</span><br /><br /><span>Ms Hayes will next face court in March 2021.</span></p>

Family & Pets

Placeholder Content Image

“They had nowhere to go”: Mum, partner and baby perish in deliberate house fire

<p>A woman has been charged with murder and arson over a house fire that killed a “young, happy” couple and their newborn baby in Melbourne.</p> <p>Abbey Forrest and her partner Inderpal Singh and their three-week-old daughter Ivy were found dead in their Point Cook townhouse after it went up in flames in the early hours of Wednesday morning.</p> <p>Arson and Explosives Squad detectives arrested 46-year-old Jenny Hayes at Airport West on Thursday morning.</p> <p>She has been charged with three counts each of murder and arson causing death.</p> <p>The incident appeared in the Melbourne Magistrates Court for a brief moment, but Ms Hayes was not present on the video link over which the hearing took place.</p> <p>Her lawyer, Erin Byrt says Ms Hayes was at at Richmond Police Station.</p> <p>The court was told she was in a “poor” state while in custody.</p> <p>She is on two different types of medication and will be assessed for pain management.</p> <p>While it is unknown what Ms Hayes’ relationships as to the family, Police previously said that it’s believed she was known to one of the occupants of the property.</p> <p>“Police are not looking for anyone else in relation to the matter,” they said.</p> <p>Ms Hayes was remanded into custody and will next appear in court on March 1, 2021.</p> <p>Neighbour Jade Bartolo was one of the first people on the scene as she revealed she was waiting for her partner to get home from work when she heard someone screaming “fire”.</p> <p>She rushed to the front door but couldn’t get in so she went and grabbed an axe from her shed.</p> <p>“Then we saw someone up at the top window, we saw someone screaming for help,” Ms Bartolo said.</p> <p>“They were trying to half hang out the window and then my partner rocked up and he started throwing the axe at the window, trying to break it for them to get out.</p> <p>“It happened in about four minutes. There was no smoke and then it was just black, the whole room.”</p> <p>But after throwing the axe about five times, Ms Bartolo’s neighbour Jemil grabbed an object from the garden bed and was able to break the window.</p> <p>“By the time we actually broke the window they didn’t hear a response from whoever was up there,” Ms Bartolo said.</p> <p>“We saw their arms, like half their body hanging out the window trying to get out the window but they couldn’t.</p> <p>“Then they fell back in and my partner said he heard them kind of take a breath and then drop to the floor. That’s the last we heard.”</p> <p>Ms Bartolo said it was “horrifying” to see the couple unable to escape.</p> <p>“It was pretty sad to see and hear them trying to get help and we couldn’t get them down. We did the best we could,” she said.</p> <p>“They were saying ‘help, help’. That’s all I can hear in my head right now, just them screaming for help. I can’t forget it.</p> <p>“They were responding at the start for like the first two minutes and then it was just black, the whole room. It was pretty terrifying.</p> <p>“I’ve never seen anything happen that fast and go through nearly three houses.”</p> <p>Ms Bartolo said there was no way the family could have escaped through the front if the fire was at the bottom of the house.</p> <p>“It scares the s*** out of me, knowing they were desperate and you can’t get out. They had nowhere to go. There’s only four windows upstairs. I have my own house and live upstairs myself.”</p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

Infection camp: Red Bull advisor suggest F1 drivers be deliberately dosed with coronavirus

<p>Red Bull’s motorsport advisor Helmut Marko has considered deliberately infecting his Formula One drivers with the new coronavirus in a camp so that they would be protected from the sickness once racing is resumed.</p> <p>As F1’s season has been indefinitely suspended by the pandemic, Marko said the company’s drivers should use this inactive period to contract the virus to ensure they would not fall ill later in the year.</p> <p>“We have four Formula One drivers and eight or 10 juniors,” the 76-year-old told Austrian TV station ORF.</p> <p>“The idea was that we would organise a camp to mentally and physically bridge the dead time and that would be the ideal time for the infection to come.</p> <p>“They are all strong young men in good health. That way they would be prepared whenever the action starts.”</p> <p>The former grand prix racer said his idea had “not been well received” by Red Bull management.</p> <p>Marko’s comments came following his earlier suggestion that driver Max Verstappen should catch the coronavirus so that he would later be able to “<a href="https://au.sports.yahoo.com/coronavirus-red-bull-boss-slammed-verstappen-joke-003502230.html">hunt down the world title completely immune</a>”.</p> <p>On March 13, the Australian Grand Prix in Melbourne was <a href="https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.formula-1-fia-and-agpc-announce-cancellation-of-the-2020-australian-grand.KKpXZDcd77WbO6T0MGoO7.html">cancelled</a> after one of the McLaren Racing Team members tested positive for COVID-19.</p> <p>Seven of the first eight F1 races this year have been postponed, while the Monaco Grand Prix scheduled for May 24 was cancelled.</p> <p>F1 CEO Chase Carey said he expected the season to resume “at some point this summer”.</p> <p>“It is not possible to provide a more specific calendar now due to the fluidity of the current situation but we expect to gain clearer insights to the situation in each of our host countries, as well as the issues related to travel to these countries, in the coming month,” he said.</p> <p>“We will continue to take advice from health officials and experts, as our first priority continues to be the safety and health of our fans, the communities we visit and those within the Formula 1 family.”</p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

Shop attendant’s horror as kids deliberately cough on them

<div class="post_body_wrapper"> <div class="post_body"> <div class="body_text "> <p>A group of children have been caught deliberately coughing on a shop attendant in Melbourne.</p> <p>The footage, which was obtained by<span> </span><a rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.9news.com.au/national/coronavirus-kids-caught-coughing-on-shop-attendant-in-alleged-deliberate-attack/3b7fd1a2-1594-4c71-b183-95a98600498d?ocid=Social-9News" target="_blank">9News</a>, shows the boys and girls at a phone repair outlet and the group are ignoring social distancing as well as hygiene rules.</p> <p>The group began coughing and spluttering on the worker.</p> <p>Shop attendant Paullie said that the kids approached her last week pretending to need a phone repaired last week.</p> <p>She decided to film the group after they started to behave erratically and cough in her face.</p> <p>"I said please stop it," she said.</p> <p>"They were just laughing at me and coughing.</p> <p>"I was really scared."</p> <p>The video was shared on Facebook, which called out the dangerous behaviour.</p> <p>"I am disgusted and saddened that these kids have done this. I honestly can't believe it," Eryn Clarke said on the post.</p> <p>"This kind of behaviour needs to be stopped. It is already a highly stressful time for everyone without disgusting cruel behaviour like this.</p> <p>"I'm hoping this video reaches the parents of these children as I'm sure they won't be impressed with their kids terrorising people like this."</p> <p>Social distancing rules means that Australians must stay 1.5 metres apart and practice safe hygiene, which includes coughing or sneezing into a tissue or your elbow.</p> </div> </div> </div>

Travel Trouble

Placeholder Content Image

​The one royal fashion protocol Kate Middleton deliberately ignores

<p>The royal family have laws they must follow for every public greeting they have.</p> <p>This also comes down to food choices and particularly, wardrobe decisions.</p> <p>Guidelines such as wearing light nail polish and avoiding black clothing during daytime royal engagements are all rules the British family are reportedly required to follow.</p> <p>However, the Duchess of Cambridge is one of the latest members to apparently break protocol during a recent engagement in Norfolk, to open the Nook Children’s Hospice, as part of her role as patron of the East Anglia’s Children’s Hospices.</p> <p>The Duchess donned an eye-catching magenta skirt by Oscar de la Renta, black Gianvito Rossi heels and an Aspinal of London clutch.</p> <p>She finished the look off with a black pair of opaque tights – which is, according to royal experts, a massive no-no.</p> <p><em><a rel="noopener" href="https://edition.cnn.com/specials/politics/state-cnn-politics-magazine" target="_blank">CNN</a> </em>royal expert Victoria Arbiter says it is irregular for royals to be spotted out in public wearing non skin-coloured tights or pantyhose.</p> <p>She previously told<span> </span><em><a rel="noopener" href="https://www.insider.com/" target="_blank">Insider</a> </em>following the 2017 engagement photo of Duchess Meghan to Prince Harry, which showed the former Ms. Markle wearing a dress without stockings that we “never see a royal without their nude stockings.”</p> <p>It is definitely not the first time the duchess has worn the darker-coloured tights, as she regularly steps out in black tights for royal engagements.</p> <p>At the time, Arbiter explained that nude stockings are “really the only hard, steadfast rule in terms of what the Queen requires”.</p> <p>This means, her Majesty’s wardrobe decisions do not have to be followed by her younger family members.</p> <p>Alexandra Messervy, chief executive of The English Manner, told<span> </span><em><a rel="noopener" href="https://www.instylemag.com.au/" target="_blank">Instyle</a> </em>that royals are “at liberty to choose whatever colour tights they wish, and indeed often opaque colours work well with outfits.</p> <p>“I think the only reason they have chosen ‘nude’ in recent years is because they have become so much more fashionable, and the ‘bare legs’ look became the craze.”</p> <p>Scroll through the gallery to see Duchess Kate breaking a royal protocol. </p>

Beauty & Style

Placeholder Content Image

Brisbane woman “deliberately” fell off cruise, police say

<p>The <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="https://www.oversixty.com.au/travel/cruising/2018/04/husbands-horror-desperate-search-after-wife-falls-overboard-on-cruise-ship/">Brisbane woman who fell overboard</a></span> </strong>from the Pacific Dawn and disappeared at sea has been identified as Natasha Schofield, but police have now confirmed the tragedy “wasn’t an accident”.</p> <p>Ms Schofield, 47, fell from an upper level deck into the ocean around 150 nautical miles west of New Caledonia on Thursday afternoon. She is presumed dead thought her body has not been found. A search for Ms Schofield was called off on Friday morning.</p> <p>The cruise ship docked in Brisbane on Sunday morning, where Queensland Police were waiting to board the ship and investigate.</p> <p>Ms Schofield was travelling with her husband and three children, aged from 12 to 16.</p> <p>Queensland Police Inspector Rob Graham said Ms Schofield’s death was intentional.</p> <p>“This wasn’t an accident,” he said. “Let’s be open and honest about mental health.”</p> <p>He added: “It’s a tragic end to what should’ve been a lifetime holiday experience for a loving family.</p> <p>“Her husband was standing right next to her when she went over.”</p> <p>Earlier reports she had been sick and fell due to a freak wave were incorrect, according to police.</p> <p>“The missing person did make intentional actions and deliberately propelled herself overboard the ship,” Insp Graham said, after police had reviewed the incident which was captured on security cameras.</p> <p>“What I saw was a couple of loving people on the top deck of a cruise ship,” he said.</p> <p>“I saw them leaning on the rails and I saw the intentional actions of the missing person take two steps back and then propel herself over the railing.</p> <p>“Her husband tried in vain to grab her when she went over ... grabbing onto her legs ... she was too far gone and subsequently she fell.</p> <p>“You’ve got three kids who are never going to see their mum again.”</p> <p>After the woman fell, her husband immediately raised the alarm and the ship began searching for the woman.</p> <p>Insp Graham said there were no nearby ships to help in the search because of “the remoteness of the location”.</p> <p>The cruise operator, Carnival Australia, said it was co-operating with the police investigation and counselling has been made available for passengers.</p> <p>“We will be able to give police CCTV footage providing an unobstructed view of what happened and portraying an obviously devoted and loving couple,” Carnival said in a statement.</p> <p>“We extend our deepest condolences to the family and hope that they will find comfort in their grief.”</p>

Cruising

Our Partners