Placeholder Content Image

"Shame on you!" Robert De Niro's courtroom outburst

<p>Robert De Niro has lost his temper in court, as his former assistant accused him of being abusive. </p> <p>The Oscar-winning actor is being sued by Graham Chase Robinson, who worked as his assistant from 2008 until several months into 2019, for millions of dollars after claiming he was abusive when they worked together. </p> <p>Robinson, 41, seeks $US12 million (approximately AUD$18 million) in damages for emotional distress and harm to her reputation, that she claims has left her jobless and unable to recover from the trauma of working for De Niro.</p> <p>The jury is also considering evidence pertaining to a lawsuit De Niro filed against Robinson in which he claimed that she stole things from him, including five million points that could be used for airline flights.</p> <p>De Niro is countersuing his former employee, seeking the return of three years of Robinson's salary.</p> <p>Robinson's attorney Andrew Macurdy interrogated the actor over some of his questionable behaviour, including allegations that he spoke to Robinson while he was urinating, and claims that he called her a "b***h" to her face.</p> <p>De Niro admitted that while he "got angry" at his former assistant, he was "never abusive".</p> <p>Growing frustrated with the line of questioning, he exclaimed, "You got us all here for this?" </p> <p>Eventually, he angrily looked toward Robinson and shouted, "Shame on you, Chase Robinson!"</p> <p>De Niro was also asked by Macurdy if he he sued Robinson before she sued him because he wanted publicity.</p> <p>"It draws attention to me. It's the last thing I wanted to do," De Niro said.</p> <p><em>Image credits: Getty Images</em></p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

"What is the big deal?" Karl defends breastfeeding mother kicked out of courtroom

<p>Karl Stefanovic has slammed the decision of a judge who kicked out a breastfeeding mother and her child from a courtroom. </p> <p><em>The Today Show</em> host ripped into Judge Mark Gamble, who ejected the wife of a prominent Melbourne Rabbi from Victorian County Court on Thursday after claiming she would be a "distraction". </p> <p>The judge called for the woman to leave the court proceedings, prompting her to leave the room in tears and leaving her feeling humiliated.</p> <p>Stefanovic condemned the decision of the Judge and shared a scathing message for anyone who agreed with how he treated the mother. </p> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"> <p dir="ltr" lang="en">A breastfeeding mother and her child were kicked out of a court's public gallery in Victoria, over concerns from the judge that it would be a distraction.<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/9Today?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#9Today</a> | WATCH LIVE 5.30am <a href="https://t.co/Q6x0r3cJui">pic.twitter.com/Q6x0r3cJui</a></p> <p>— The Today Show (@TheTodayShow) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheTodayShow/status/1633911235048603650?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 9, 2023</a></p></blockquote> <p>"I think that's ridiculous. We were just laughing about it because it's so absurd."</p> <p>"I can't believe in this modern society," he said on Friday morning</p> <p>"There are going to be people out there who say, 'Oh, well, she could've gone outside somewhere else'. Come off it, what is the big deal?"</p> <p><em>Today</em> co-host Sarah Abo also shared her thoughts on the matter, saying, "How far have we gone as a community to accept that in our own courtrooms you can't do that? It's ludicrous."</p> <p>Many outraged women have chimed in on the debate, with Melbourne obstetrician Nisha Khot describing the incident as appalling. </p> <p>"We've tried so hard to get past so many barriers for women who want to breastfeed and to have this happen in a court of law is just not acceptable at all," she said.</p> <p>"Babies have been breastfed in the parliament of this country and in other parliaments."</p> <p>"I don't think there is any public space in which breastfeeding a baby should be unacceptable."</p> <p><em>Image credits: The Today Show</em></p>

Family & Pets

Placeholder Content Image

"No interest in justice!" Andrew O'Keefe's courtroom explosion

<p>Disgraced TV host Andrew O'Keefe has screamed at a magistrate in his latest court appearance, claiming he had “no interest in justice” and was threatened with contempt of court after he was again denied bail.</p> <p>As O'Keefe fronted Sydney’s Central Local Court on Wednesday afternoon, he appeared visibly distressed and frustrated. </p> <p>The 50-year-old was hit with six charges in January after police alleged that he grabbed a woman by the throat, punched her and pushed her to the ground, to which he pled not guilty to all charges. </p> <p>Mr O’Keefe has been remanded in custody since his arrest and lost his last bid for bail in the NSW Supreme Court in March.</p> <p>Defence lawyer Sharon Ramsden presented a fresh application for bail on Wednesday, in which she argued that more evidence had been served on Mr O’Keefe that outlined the “lack of injury” on the complainant.</p> <p>Over the bail hearing that lasted almost two-hours, Mr O’Keefe was audibly frustrated over what was being said in court.</p> <p>A prosecutor opposed the bail application and said there was “no new information” to warrant the request,</p> <p>“There’s not fresh circumstances in what has been put before the court … he has been in rehab nine times,” he said.</p> <p>Mr O’Keefe spoke over the prosecutor to deny the allegations as magistrate Daniel Reiss warned him he would be “going backwards by speaking up”.</p> <p>“That’s simply not true Your Honour,” Mr O’Keefe said, raising his voice.</p> <p>“I’m just getting the truth out there.”</p> <p>Mr O’Keefe continued to interrupt and shake his head in frustration as magistrate Daniel Reiss told the court of the 50-year-old’s mental health and drug issues.</p> <p>The magistrate warned that Mr O’Keefe was bordering on being in contempt of court.</p> <p>“I’ve dealt with many defendants, some are psychotic and are not as hard to deal with as you. Someone with legal qualifications and 10 warnings should know how to deal with it,” Mr Reiss said.</p> <p>Mr Reiss denied bail, saying he was not willing to allow the “unacceptable risk” of letting Mr O’Keefe leave custody.</p> <p>Mr O’Keefe gathered his papers and stood up before saying, “The transcript will say I was not arguing, I was trying to help you Your Honour.”</p> <p>“You have no interest in justice,” Mr O’Keefe continued before storming out.</p> <p>Mr O’Keefe will return to court for a hearing in June.</p> <p><em>Image credits: A Current Affair</em></p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

Andrew O'Keefe claims he is "the victim" in bizarre courtroom rant

<p>Disgraced TV host Andrew O'Keefe has gone on a bizarre rant while appearing in court over charges of assaulting a Sydney sex worker.</p> <p>The 50-year-old told the Central Local Court magistrate that he was "the victim" in the situation while appearing in court via video link from western Sydney's Metropolitan Remand and Reception Centre.</p> <p>O'Keefe has been incarcerated for over six weeks, and claims he has been "bullied and taunted" by prison officers and guards. </p> <p>The hearing before Magistrate Lisa Viney was to finalise suppression orders on the identity, appearance or address of the sex worker who alleges he choked her in his apartment on January 25th to the point she had to bite him to break free.</p> <p>Magistrate Viney discussed the details of a 10 year non-publication order on the alleged choking victim's identity, to which O'Keefe said, "I am predisposed towards accepting (but) I have one query."</p> <p>O'Keefe went on to claim this order was placed on the grounds of "the complainant's depression and suicide ideality is based on the offence of 25 January", but argued there was "no offence on this date".</p> <p>When the magistrate explained the order was based on how the extent of publicity from the case had affected the woman's "personal mental health and implications for her family", O'Keefe continued to argue.</p> <p>"Neither the police nor the court have taken into account the effect on MY mental health ... the effect of ... publicity of this in which I am the victim and am suffering at this very moment from the publicity."</p> <p>"It is an injustice against me and should not have been brought in the first place."</p> <p>Dismissing his selfish outburst, Magistrate Viney remanded O'Keefe back into custody, with a hearing date still yet to be set. </p> <p><em>Image credits: Getty Images</em></p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

Piers Morgan lashes out over Meghan Markle victory

<p>Disgraced ex-TV host Piers Morgan has come out swinging once again at Meghan Markle, in the wake of her victory in court against the Mail on Sunday. </p> <p>Piers, who currently writes for the Daily Mail, took to Twitter to call Meghan "Princess Pinocchio", and blast her of being "two-faced".</p> <p>Meghan sued the Mail on Sunday over the publication of a "personal and private" letter she sent her father Thomas Markle in 2018. </p> <p class="">Publishers Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL) launched an appeal against a decision to grant a summary judgment - meaning The Duchess didn't need to face a high-profile trial.</p> <p class="">The judges at the Court of Appeal ruled in Markle's favour, and dismissed new claims of that threatened her credibility. </p> <p class="">Within hours of the ruling, Piers lashed out at the Meghan once again, while also promoting his Daily Mail opinion column. </p> <p class=""><span>Piers tweeted, "A responsive statement from Piers, The Earl of Exposing Princess Pinocchio Bullsh*t, will be published shortly."</span></p> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"> <p dir="ltr">A responsive statement from Piers, The Earl of Exposing Princess Pinocchio Bullsh*t, will be published shortly. <a href="https://t.co/biTPSirxvY">pic.twitter.com/biTPSirxvY</a></p> — Piers Morgan (@piersmorgan) <a href="https://twitter.com/piersmorgan/status/1466379930804146184?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 2, 2021</a></blockquote> <p class=""><span>In a statement from Meghan Markle, she said that her win in court would transcend her personal experience, and would help anyone slated by the press. </span></p> <p class="">She said, "This is a victory not just for me, but for anyone who has ever felt scared to stand up for what's right."</p> <p class="">Morgan argued with Markle's statement saying that the case was "beyond parody".</p> <p class="">In his Daily Mail column, he wrote, <span>"She can claim 'victory' all she likes after this court case, but all it really did was expose her real character to the world and the cold hard two-faced reality at the heart of Meghan and Harry's attitude to privacy."</span></p> <p class=""><span>When sharing his column to his following on Twitter, he added, "Put your gloating champagne away, Princess Pinocchio - the court of public opinion now knows you're a fork-tongued devious manipulative piece of work who only wants to protect your privacy so you can sell it."</span></p> <p class=""><em>Image credits: Getty Images</em></p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

Porsche driver Richard Pusey's wild courtroom outburst

<p>Porsche driver Richard Pusey went on a bizarre tirade during his bail application in court on Monday. </p> <p>The 43-year-old is facing charges of false imprisonment, making threats to kill and reckless conduct for allegedly "placing a noose around the neck" of a woman and assault in relation to a seperate incident. </p> <p>At the Melbourne Magistrates Court, Pusey became irritated and launched into a strange rant about his situation. </p> <p><span>“I’ll see you next Monday … I’m really not interested in this judicial system, it doesn’t work, it doesn’t help anyone,” he said. </span></p> <p><span>“I would get better justice in Belarus under (President Alexander) Lukashenko.”</span></p> <p><span>Pusey has already served his 10-month jail term for outraging public decency and other offences in relation to a crash on the Eastern Freeway. </span></p> <p><span>The crash, which took place in April 2020, saw the death of four police officers, as Pusey filmed the bodies of the officers while making highly inappropriate remarks. </span></p> <p><span>During his courtroom outburst, Magistrate Luisa Bazzani ordered Pusey’s microphone to be muted as she said she "would not tolerate language like this."</span></p> <p><span>Pusey's defence lawyer asked to speak privately with his client as the court was briefly adjourned, but he was not able to get through to him. </span><span></span></p> <p><span>The magistrate told the court that Pusey had been removed from the interview “because he damaged a camera” and was refusing to return to the room.</span></p> <p><span>The magistrate pulled Pusey's application for a suppression order, so he would not be "coerced into something he doesn’t want to do.”</span></p> <p><span>It is unclear when the court proceedings will resume. </span></p> <p><em>Image credit: Nine News</em></p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

Now Kate’s friend threatens to sue Christian Porter

<p>In walking away from his defamation action against the ABC, cabinet minister Christian Porter has opened a fresh round in the battle over the allegation of historical rape against him by a now-deceased woman, known just as Kate.</p> <p>Jo Dyer, a friend of Kate – whose claim Porter denies – on Tuesday threatened to sue him, accusing him of impugning “my honesty and integrity”.</p> <p>There is also now a battle over the settlement concluded between Porter and the ABC.</p> <p>The federal court has yet to ratify the settlement, which involves expunging from the court record part of the ABC’s defence in the defamation case. But news organisations are seeking to have the material made public.</p> <p>Justice Jayne Jagot said on Tuesday the issue might not be a matter for the parties. “There has to be a reason for the removal of a document from a court file,” she said. “It’s not done just because a party wants to do it.”</p> <p>If a document is removed from the court file, there cannot be applications to see it.</p> <p>ABC journalist Louise Milligan, who Porter also sued in his case against an ABC article reporting the accusation without naming him, tweeted on Monday “We are still absolutely committed to the 27 redacted pages being in the public domain”.</p> <p>Dyer brought the successful legal action that resulted in Porter’s high profile barrister Sue Chrysanthou being prevented from appearing in the defamation case because of a conflict of interest.</p> <p>Dyer said in her statement her lawyers had sent a second “concerns notice” to Porter over his “continuing defamatory comments”. “He should be on notice that if I launch legal proceedings, I tend to see them through to their conclusion,” she said.</p> <p>She alleged two defamations by Porter. She said that on May 12, he implied her legal proceedings were “part of an improper last minute legal strategy to disrupt his now discontinued action”.</p> <p>“He did this despite knowing the real reason for the court action, and the lengths to which I had gone over the preceding two months to avoid court,” she said.</p> <p>“Yesterday Mr Porter alleged that, after ‘coaching’ from Ms Milligan, I had destroyed important communications that may have had a bearing on his now discontinued action against Ms Milligan and the ABC.</p> <p>"This is absurd. As I stated in court under oath, a number of people, of whom Ms Milligan was but one, encouraged me to treat all communications about our dear friend Kate, and the allegations she made against Mr Porter, with the care and respect she and they warranted.</p> <p>"I endeavoured to do so by both filing and deleting correspondence between me and other individuals as appropriate.</p> <p>"There was nothing improper, illegal or sinister in my decisions to save or delete certain messages, decisions that were taken well before Mr Porter launched his now discontinued action against Ms Milligan and the ABC.”</p> <p>Dyer said the allegations Kate made against Porter “remain completely untested. Until they have been investigated, it is untenable for Mr Porter to remain in cabinet.”</p> <p>Shadow Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus said an independent inquiry was needed into whether Porter was fit to continue as a cabinet minister. Dreyfus also said the ABC material should be publicly available.<!-- Below is The Conversation's page counter tag. Please DO NOT REMOVE. --><img style="border: none !important; box-shadow: none !important; margin: 0 !important; max-height: 1px !important; max-width: 1px !important; min-height: 1px !important; min-width: 1px !important; opacity: 0 !important; outline: none !important; padding: 0 !important; text-shadow: none !important;" src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/161911/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /><!-- End of code. If you don't see any code above, please get new code from the Advanced tab after you click the republish button. The page counter does not collect any personal data. More info: https://theconversation.com/republishing-guidelines --></p> <p><span><a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/michelle-grattan-20316">Michelle Grattan</a>, Professorial Fellow, <em><a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/university-of-canberra-865">University of Canberra</a></em></span></p> <p>This article is republished from <a href="https://theconversation.com">The Conversation</a> under a Creative Commons license. Read the <a href="https://theconversation.com/now-kates-friend-threatens-to-sue-christian-porter-161911">original article</a>.</p>

Relationships

Placeholder Content Image

Ben Roberts-Smith’s ex-wife accused of leaking shocking photos

<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"> Lawyers representing Ben Roberts-Smith have told the Federal Court his ex-wife leaked images to the media of soldiers drinking out of a prosthetic leg.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Victoria Cross recipient is suing newspapers owned by Nine over stories alleging he committed war crimes in Afghanistan between 2009 and 2012 and punched a woman in the face in 2018.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The high-profile trial is due to start on Monday, June 7, where the newspapers will rely on truth as a defence.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Matthew Richardson, one of the barristers on Mr Robert-Smith’s legal team, told a pre-trial hearing the team was still looking through the various images on USB drives that were part of the case.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><img style="width: 500px; height: 333.33333333333337px;" src="https://oversixtydev.blob.core.windows.net/media/7841599/roberts-smith.jpg" alt="" data-udi="umb://media/cc74fc57c8b84074a7e0111e81b861e6" /></span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Nine alleged the images of soldiers drinking from the prosthetic leg of a deceased Afghan man were contained on the drives, which it alleges were found buried in Mr Robert-Smith’s backyard.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">After the court heard the newspaper’s legal teams were still unable to access the content of the USB drives, Mr Richardson said Mr Robert-Smith’s former wife, Emma Roberts, leaked the images.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">He also said processing the images depicting the prosthetic leg has been such an “onerous” task that it won’t be completed by the time the trial opens.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><img style="width: 500px; height: 333.33333333333337px;" src="https://oversixtydev.blob.core.windows.net/media/7841598/roberts-smith-1.jpg" alt="" data-udi="umb://media/b27f5b79e2c143789a7bfe1afc19d995" /></span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Lyndelle Barnett, one of the lawyers acting for the newspapers, disputed the claim and said her clients did not have the material nor did they receive it from Ms Roberts-Smith.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Ms Barnett continued, saying only one of her clients had the information being discussed but couldn’t share it with lawyers due to national security laws.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Justice Anthony Besanko said that though the court would be open to the public during the trial, live-streaming the proceedings was unlikely due to the risk of revealing national security information.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“My present inclination is not to,” he said.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“That risk seems to be one that needs to be taken into account.”</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The trial is expected to run for up to 10 weeks, with the court hearing that the opening address by Bruce McClintock SC - Mr Robert-Smith’s chief barrister - would run for two to three days.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Mr Roberts-Smith will be the first witness, with his evidence likely taking four days.</span></p> <p><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">Images: Nine</span></em></p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

Cheers erupt in courtroom as George Pell’s appeal against conviction is denied

<p>George Pell has lost his bid for freedom with his appeal against child sex convictions being dismissed in court.</p> <p>By a majority of two to one, all eyes were on Victoria’s Supreme Court as the three judges dismissed the appeal by ordering Pell to “return to prison”.</p> <p>According to<span> </span><a rel="noopener" href="https://www.news.com.au/national/victoria/courts-law/george-pell-to-learn-whether-appeal-against-conviction-is-successful/news-story/dd0d54d308aa68fb03793d54244800af" target="_blank">news.com.au</a>, Chief Justice Anne Ferguson was strict.</p> <p> “He will continue to serve his sentence of six years imprisonment,” Chief Justice Anne Ferguson said.</p> <p>“He will remain eligible to apply for parole after he has served three years and eight months of the sentence.”</p> <p>Pell sat and digested this information quietly as he listened to the Chief Justice lay down her verdict. As he realised his appeal was rejected, he looked dejected while hunching forward.</p> <p>He was led out of the courtroom just after 10 am and taken back to prison to serve out the rest of his jail sentence.</p> <p>As his appeal was denied, cheers were heard inside the courtroom as dozens of people watched the appeal on the livestream outside.</p> <p>Pell shared the courtroom with the media, his own supporters and the family members of the two boys he was found guilty of sexually abusing in 1996.</p> <p>Chief Justice Ferguson said that the three judges watched the recordings of the trial, which included a recorded interview with Cardinal Pell.</p> <p>“Those recordings went for more than 30 hours and we’ve watched them more than once,” she said.</p> <p>Chief Justice Ferguson said the judges “did not experience a doubt” and “throughout his evidence, the complainant came across as somebody who was telling the truth”.</p> <p>She also rejected the notion that George Pell’s robes were “not able to be moved” to reveal his genitals because of various layers of material. She told the court “the robes were capable of being maneuvered ... pulled apart”.</p> <p>Despite his appeal being rejected, those close to Pell say that he may continue his fight to walk free and that his lawyers are looking to take his appeal to the High Court of Australia. Pell has always maintained his innocence.</p>

Legal

Our Partners