Placeholder Content Image

Bushfires are Australia's costliest natural disaster

<p>It’s hard to estimate the eventual economic cost of Australia’s 2019-20 megafires, partly because they are still underway, and partly because it is hard to know the cost to attribute to deaths and the decimation of species and habitats, but it is easy to get an idea of its significance – the cost will be unprecedented.</p> <p>The deadliest bushfires in the past 200 years took place in 1851, then 1939, then 1983, 2009, now 2019-20. The years between them are shrinking rapidly. Only a remote grassfire in central Australia in 1974-75 rivalled them in terms of size, although not in biomass burnt or loss of life.</p> <p>The term “<a href="http://www.sfrc.ufl.edu/CFEOR/LogIn/log%20in%20docs/recent%20research/mega%20fires.pdf">megafire</a>” is a new one, defined in the early 2000s to help describe disturbing new wildfires emerging in the United States – massive blazes, usually above 400,000 hectares, often joining up, that create more than usual destruction to life and property.</p> <p>Australia’s current fires <a href="http://www.sfrc.ufl.edu/CFEOR/LogIn/log%20in%20docs/recent%20research/mega%20fires.pdf">dwarf</a> the US fires that inspired the term.</p> <p>They are 25 times the size of Australia’s deadliest bushfires, the 2009 Black Saturday fires in Victoria that directly killed 173 people, and so large and intense that they create their own weather in which winds throw embers 30 kilometres or more ahead of the front and pyro-cumulus clouds produce dry lightning that ignites new fires.</p> <p>The Black Saturday fires burnt <a href="https://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/papers/govpub/VPARL2006-10No225Introductory.pdf">430,000 hectares</a>. The current fires have killed fewer people but have so far burnt <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/datablog/ng-interactive/2019/dec/07/how-big-are-the-fires-burning-on-the-east-coast-of-australia-interactive-map">10.7 million hectares</a> – an area the size of <a href="https://graphics.reuters.com/AUSTRALIA-BUSHFIRES-SCALE/0100B4VK2PN/index.html">South Korea</a>, or Scotland and Wales combined.</p> <p><strong>There are easy to measure costs…</strong></p> <p>The federal government has promised to put at least <a href="https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/bushfire-recovery-fund-to-get-2-billion-over-two-years-20200106-p53p8j.html">A$2 billion</a> into a National Bushfire Recovery Fund, which is roughly the size of the first estimate of the cost of the fires calculated by Terry Rawnsley of SGS Economics and Planning.</p> <p>He put the cost at somewhere between <a href="https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/the-economic-cost-of-bushfires-on-sydney-revealed-up-to-50-million-a-day-and-rising-20191212-p53jbq.html">A$1.5 and $2.5 billion</a>, using his firm’s modelling of the cost of the NSW Tathra fires in March 2018 as a base.</p> <p>It’s the total of the lost income from farm production, tourism and the like.</p> <p>It is possible to get an idea of wider costs using the findings of the <a href="http://royalcommission.vic.gov.au/Commission-Reports/Final-Report.html">2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission</a>.</p> <p>It came up with an estimate for tangible costs of <a href="http://royalcommission.vic.gov.au/Finaldocuments/volume-1/HR/VBRC_Vol1_AppendixA_HR.pdf">A$4.369 billion</a>, which after inflation would be about $5 billion in today’s dollars.</p> <p><strong>…and harder-to-measure costs</strong></p> <p>Tangible costs are hose easily measured including the cost of replacing things such as destroyed homes, contents and vehicles.</p> <p>They also include the human lives lost, which were valued at A$3.7 million per life (2009 dollars) in accordance with a <a href="https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/3310859/best-practice-regulation-guidance-note-value-of-statistical-life">Commonwealth standard</a>.</p> <p>The measure didn’t include the effect of injuries and shortened lives due to smoke-related stroke and cardiovascular and lung diseases, or damage to species and habitats, the loss of livestock, grain and feed, crops, orchards and national and local parks.</p> <p>Also excluded were “inangibles”, among them the social costs of mental health problems and unemployment and increases in suicide, substance abuse, relationship breakdowns and domestic violence.</p> <p>The cost of inangibles can peak years after a disaster and continue to take tolls for decades, if not generations.</p> <p>One attempt to estimate the cost of intangibles was made by Deloitte Access Economics, in work for the <a href="https://www2.deloitte.com/au/en/pages/economics/articles/building-australias-natural-disaster-resilience.html">Australian Business Roundtable for Disaster Resilience &amp; Safer Communities</a>.</p> <p>Deloitte put the tangible costs of the Black Saturday fires at A$3.1 billion in 2015 dollars and the intangible costs at more than that again: A$3.9 billion, producing a total of A$7 billion, which would be A$7.6 billion in today’s dollars.</p> <p><strong>Black Saturday is a starting point</strong><span class="attribution"><span class="source"></span></span></p> <p>This season’s megafires are, so far, less costly than the 2009 Victorian fires in terms of human life, roughly on par in terms of lost homes, and less costly for other structures.</p> <p>But given that considerably more land has been burnt we can expect other costs to eclipse those of Black Saturday.</p> <p>As of today, 25 times as much land has been burnt.</p> <p>Scaling up the royal commission’s Black Saturday figures for the size of the fire and scaling them down for the fewer deaths and other things that shouldn’t be scaled up produces an estimate of tangible costs of A$103 billion in today’s dollars.</p> <p>The Deloitte Access Economics ratio of intangible to tangible costs suggests a total for both types of costs of A$230 billion.</p> <p>As it happens the tangible costs estimate is close to an estimate of A$100 billion prepared using methods by University of Queensland economist <a href="https://edition.cnn.com/2020/01/10/perspectives/australia-fires-cost/index.html">John Quiggin</a>.</p> <p>The reality won’t be clear for some time.</p> <p>There are several weeks of fire season remaining, and we are yet to reach the usual peak season for Victoria, which is in the first week of February.</p> <p>What we can safely say, with weeks left to go, is that these fires are by far Australia’s costliest natural disaster.<!-- Below is The Conversation's page counter tag. Please DO NOT REMOVE. --><img style="border: none !important; box-shadow: none !important; margin: 0 !important; max-height: 1px !important; max-width: 1px !important; min-height: 1px !important; min-width: 1px !important; opacity: 0 !important; outline: none !important; padding: 0 !important; text-shadow: none !important;" src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/129433/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /><!-- End of code. If you don't see any code above, please get new code from the Advanced tab after you click the republish button. The page counter does not collect any personal data. More info: http://theconversation.com/republishing-guidelines --></p> <p><em><a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/paul-read-18089">Paul Read</a>, Climate Criminologist &amp; Senior Instructor/Lecturer, Faculty of Medicine, <a href="http://theconversation.com/institutions/monash-university-1065">Monash University</a> and <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/richard-denniss-4045">Richard Denniss</a>, Adjunct Professor, <a href="http://theconversation.com/institutions/crawford-school-of-public-policy-australian-national-university-3292">Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University</a></em></p> <p><em>This article is republished from <a href="http://theconversation.com">The Conversation</a> under a Creative Commons license. Read the <a href="https://theconversation.com/with-costs-approaching-100-billion-the-fires-are-australias-costliest-natural-disaster-129433">original article</a>.</em></p>

Domestic Travel

Placeholder Content Image

Six million hectares of threatened species habitat up in smoke

<p>More than <a href="https://sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2020/01/08/australian-bushfires-more-than-one-billion-animals-impacted.html">one billion mammals, birds, and reptiles</a> across eastern Australia are estimated to have been affected by the current fire catastrophe.</p> <p>Many animals and plants have been incinerated or suffocated by smoke and ash. Others may have escaped the blaze only to die of exhaustion or starvation, or be picked off by predators.</p> <p>But even these huge losses of individual animals and plants do not reveal the full scale of impact that the recent fires have had on biodiversity.</p> <p>Plants, <a href="https://theconversation.com/australias-bushfires-could-drive-more-than-700-animal-species-to-extinction-check-the-numbers-for-yourself-129773">invertebrates</a>, freshwater fish, and frogs have also been affected, and the impact of the fires is likely to be disproportionately greater for <a href="https://theconversation.com/a-season-in-hell-bushfires-push-at-least-20-threatened-species-closer-to-extinction-129533">threatened species</a>.</p> <p>To delve deeper into the conservation impact, we used publicly available satellite imagery to look at the burnt areas (up to January 7, 2020) and see how they overlapped with the approximate distributions of all the threatened animals and plants listed under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act.</p> <p>We restricted our analysis to the mediterranean and temperate zone of south-east and south-west Australia.</p> <p><strong>The bad news</strong></p> <p>We found that 99% of the area burned in the current fires contains potential habitat for at least one nationally listed threatened species. We conservatively estimate that six million hectares of threatened species habitat has been burned.</p> <p>Given that many fires are still burning and it is not yet clear how severe the burning has been in many areas, the number of species affected and the extent of the impact may yet change.</p> <p>What we do know is that these species are already on the brink of extinction due to other threats, such as <a href="https://theconversation.com/environment-laws-have-failed-to-tackle-the-extinction-emergency-heres-the-proof-122936">land clearing</a>, invasive species, climate change, disease, or previous fires.</p> <p>Approximately 70 nationally threatened species have had at least 50% of their range burnt, while nearly 160 threatened species have had more than 20% of their range burnt.</p> <p>More threatened plants have been affected than other groups: 209 threatened plant species have had more than 5% of their range burnt compared to 16 mammals, ten frogs, six birds, four reptiles, and four freshwater fish.</p> <p>Twenty-nine of the 30 species that have had more than 80% of their range burnt are plants. Several species have had their entire range consumed by the fires, such as the Mountain Trachymene, a <a href="http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/species/pubs/9367-conservation-advice.pdf">fire-sensitive</a> plant found in only four locations in the South Eastern Highlands of NSW.</p> <p>Other species that have been severely impacted include the Kangaroo Island dunnart and the Kangaroo Island glossy black cockatoo. These species’ entire populations numbered only in the hundreds prior to these bushfires that have burned more than 50% of their habitat.</p> <p>Glossy black cockatoos have a highly specialised diet. They eat the seeds of the drooping sheoak <a href="https://ecos.csiro.au/glossy-black-cockatoos/">(<em>Allocasuarina verticillata</em>).</a> These trees may take anywhere from 10 to 50 years to recover enough to produce sufficient food for the black cockatoos.</p> <p>The populations of many species will need careful management and protection to give their habitats enough time to recover and re-supply critical resources.</p> <p>The figures above do not account for cumulative impacts of previous fires. For example, the critically endangered western ground parrot had around 6,000 hectares of potential habitat burnt in these fires, which exacerbates the impact of earlier extensive fires in 2015 and early 2019.</p> <p>Threatened species vary in their ability to cope with fire. For fire-sensitive species, almost every individual dies or is displaced. The long-term consequences are likely to be dire, particularly if vegetation composition is irrevocably changed by severe fire or the area is subject to repeat fires.</p> <p>More than 50% of the habitat of several species known to be susceptible to fire has been burnt – these include the long-footed potoroo and Littlejohn’s tree frog.</p> <p>Some species are likely to thrive after fire. Indeed, of the top 30 most impacted species on our list, almost 20% will likely flourish due to low competition in their burnt environments – these are all re-sprouting plants. Others will do well if they are not burnt again before they can set seed.</p> <p><strong>Rising from the ashes</strong></p> <p>For fire-sensitive threatened species, these fires could have substantially increased the probability of extinction by virtue of direct mortality in the fires or reducing the amount of suitable habitat. However, after the embers settle, with enough investment and conservation actions, guided by evidence-based science, it may be possible to help threatened species recover.</p> <p>Protection and conservation-focussed management of areas that have not burned will be the single most important action if threatened species are to have any chance of persistence and eventual recovery.</p> <p>Management of threatening processes (such as weeds, feral predators, <a href="https://theconversation.com/double-trouble-as-feral-horse-numbers-gallop-past-25-000-in-the-australian-alps-128852">introduced herbivores</a>, and habitat loss through logging or thinning) must occur not just at key sites, but across the landscapes they sit in. Maintaining only small pockets of habitat in a landscape of destruction will lock many species on the pathway to extinction.</p> <p>In some cases, rigorous post-fire restoration will be necessary to allow species to re-colonise burnt areas. This may include intensive weed control and assisted regeneration of threatened flora and specific food sources for fauna, installing nest boxes and artificial cover, or even targeted <a href="https://www.smh.com.au/environment/conservation/massive-food-drop-to-help-save-endangered-wallabies-in-fire-affected-areas-20200112-p53qss.html">supplementary feeding</a>.</p> <p>Unconventional recovery actions will be needed because this unique situation calls for outside-the-box thinking.</p> <p><strong>Playing the long game</strong></p> <p>These fires were made larger and more severe by <a href="http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/drought/">record hot, dry conditions</a>. Global temperatures have so far risen by approximately 1°C from pre-industrial levels.</p> <p><a href="https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2865/a-degree-of-concern-why-global-temperatures-matter/">Current projections indicate that we are on track for a 3°C increase.</a> What will that look like?</p> <p>We are in a moment of collective grief for what has been lost. A species lost is not just a word on a page, but an entire world of unique traits, behaviours, connections to other living things, and beauty.</p> <p>These losses do not need to be in vain. We have an opportunity to transform our collective grief into collective action.</p> <p>Australians are now personally experiencing climate impacts in an unprecedented way. We must use this moment to galvanise our leaders to act on climate change, here in Australia and on the world stage.</p> <p>The futures of our beloved plants and animals, and our own, depend on it.</p> <p><em>Written by Michelle Ward, Aaron Greenville, April Reside, Ayesha Tulloch, Brooke Williams, Emily Massingham, Helen Mayfield, Hugh Possingham, James Watson, Jim Radford and Laura Sonter. Republished with permission of <a href="https://theconversation.com/six-million-hectares-of-threatened-species-habitat-up-in-smoke-129438">The Conversation.</a></em></p>

Caring

Our Partners