Placeholder Content Image

“Utter madness”: Australian Open thriller drags past 3am

<p dir="ltr">Day five of the Australian Open has seen a nail-biting match between Russian champion Daniil Medvedev and Finnish player Emil Ruusuvuori drag on until 3:30am. </p> <p dir="ltr">The epic match would’ve lasted even longer, if Medvedev didn’t blow away Ruusuvuori in the fifth set, claiming his victory and winning 3-6 6-7 6-4 7-6 6-0.</p> <p dir="ltr">Before the Australian Open began, the ATP and WTA introduced new rules that would force night sessions to begin prior to 7:30pm and prevent matches from going on court after 11pm.</p> <p dir="ltr">However, the Australian Open is not bound by these rules meaning that when Medvedev and Ruusuvuori stepped on court at 11:15pm, there was little chance of them finishing anytime before the early hours of the morning. </p> <p dir="ltr">The match was already in its fourth hour before the fifth set began at 3:20am, as Ruusuvuori lost his steam in the final set. </p> <p dir="ltr">Speaking after the match, Medvedev paid tribute to the fans who stuck around, saying he wouldn’t be among them if he didn’t have to play.</p> <p dir="ltr">“Honestly guys, I would not be here,” Medvedev said. “Thanks for staying.”</p> <p dir="ltr">“If I’d have been a tennis fan and I had come, at 1 I’d be ‘okay, let’s go home, we’ll catch the end of the match on the TV, we’ll watch 30 minutes and then go to bed’.”</p> <p dir="ltr">“So I guess thanks guys, you are strong.”</p> <p dir="ltr">Sports fans and commentators echoed Medvedev’s statements online, as journalist Ryan Sidle wrote on X that the match has descended into “utter madness”. </p> <p dir="ltr">The epic showdown now makes it two years in a row that an Australian Open match has gone into the early hours of the morning, with Thanasi Kokkinakis and Andy Murray taking their AO battle to 4am in the 2023 competition. </p> <p dir="ltr"><em>Image credits: Getty Images</em></p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

Novak Djokovic kicks his brother out of tennis arena during epic showdown

<p>Novak Djokovic has ordered his brother out of the player's box in the middle of match at the the Adelaide International final.</p> <p>The Serbian star was having a less than desirable game on Sunday, after losing his first set to No.33 Sebastian Korda, from the USA, when he became visibly frustrated and pointed towards the corporate box.</p> <p>His brother Marko and another person then exited the area before Djokovic fought his way back on the court and managed to win the epic three-set thriller.</p> <p>Sports commentator Roger Rasheed claimed the sports star appeared angry, but determined to win the showdown.</p> <p>"He pointed to his box and two out of five members are no longer sitting there," he said.</p> <p>"It's probably living proof that he wants to win badly, in this final. He's got his game face on, mixed with a bit of anger at the moment."</p> <p>Speaking during an on-court interview after prevailing triumphant in a match that lasted three hours, the 21-time Grand Slam champion admitted it had not been an easy night.</p> <p>"I'd like to thank my team for handling me, tolerating me in the good and bad times."</p> <p>"Today, I'm sure they didn't have such a blast with me going back and forth with them, but I appreciate them being here."</p> <p>"My brother Marko is also here, I don't see him that much so I appreciate you coming here, love you. It's been an amazing week and you guys made it even more special for me."</p> <p><em>Image credits: Getty Images</em></p>

Family & Pets

Placeholder Content Image

Prince Charles gears up for showdown with Prince Andrew

<p>Prince Charles is reportedly furious with his brother Prince Andrew as the scandals surrounding the Duke of York continue to grow.</p> <p>As the Prince of Wales is flying back to the United Kingdom after his tour of New Zealand and the Solomon Islands, he is reportedly furious about his brother’s disastrous BBC interview.</p> <p>According to insiders, the Prince of Wales is furious that the BBC interview overshadowed his royal tour and is planning to speak to the Duke of York when he returns on Tuesday.</p> <p>This comes after Buckingham Palace confirmed that Prince Andrew would be “standing back” from all his patronages as well as his royal duties.</p> <p>“The Duke has over 230 patronages. He will be stepping back from public duty and temporarily standing back from all his patronages,” a spokeswoman told the PA news agency.</p> <p>However, Prince Andrew will continue to work on his Pitch@Palace program, which is a program designed to help young entrepreneurs. The program was dropped by several Australian universities last week after the interview.</p> <p>“(The Duke) will look at how he takes this forward outside of his public duties, and outside of Buckingham Palace. We recognise there will be a period of time while this transition takes place,” the spokeswoman said.</p> <p>A royal insider told<span> </span><em><a rel="noopener" href="https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/prince-andrew-election-fears-made-charles-call-for-duke-to-be-removed-39xfn0ntn" target="_blank">The Times</a></em><span> </span>that questioning whether or not Prince Andrew was “fit for purpose” on<span> </span><em>IITV<span> </span></em>was the final straw for Prince Charles.</p> <p>The questions were posed to Boris Johnson and Jeremy Corbyn during their first election debate.</p> <p>“Prince Charles and his private secretary were determined that this should not be allowed to drag on and on. The question of the election was critical,” they said.</p> <p>Former BBC correspondent Peter Hunt says that the Queen had no choice but to make her son step down after the scandal.</p> <p>“After her error of judgment when she let Andrew do the interview, the palace are keen to show a decisive Queen,” former BBC correspondent Peter Hunt said on Twitter.</p> <p>“But it’s Charles and his people who are increasingly pulling the strings.”</p>

International Travel

Placeholder Content Image

Showdown: Are home brand products as good as label brands?

<p>ALDI is a force to be reckoned with in the supermarket space, if you believe the customers rave reviews about the bargain prices and deals you can snag from the German store.</p> <p>Questions have since been raised about how the supermarket’s food items taste compared to the brand names they knock off.</p> <p>ALDI converts Nat and Nick spoke to<span> </span><em>A Current Affair</em><span> </span>about how they’ve changed their brand-name buying ways.</p> <p>"If it tastes the same, why not? But they even look the same so when I first started buying them, I thought I was buying the originals," Nat said.</p> <p>"So the CC's are around $1.70, and these El Toro's are around 87 cents, so that's nearly half price really."</p> <p>According to retail expert Gary Mortimer, this is exactly the supermarket’s goal.</p> <p>"Aldi do a couple of things right, such as the packaging of their private label products. They mimic very closely a national branded products and they do so that shoppers can easily identify them," Mortimer said.</p> <p>"You might see packets of crumpets or packets of cereal or biscuits that look very similar to the national branded product.</p> <p>"They also invest heavily in quality, particularly in ingredients and taste quality and therefore get customers coming back very quickly."</p> <p>Scroll through the gallery to see the similarities between home-brand and branded products, including Tim Tams, Milo and Nutrigrain.</p> <p><em>Photo credits:<span> </span><a rel="noopener" href="https://www.9now.com.au/a-current-affair" target="_blank">A Current Affair</a></em></p>

Food & Wine

Placeholder Content Image

The moment you missed on The Block: Judge Shaynna Blaze's heated showdown with Sara

<p>Infamous <em>The Block</em> contestant Sara has ignited a war with judge and interior design veteran Shaynna Blaze, causing tension between the pair in last night’s episode.</p> <p>Blaze offered Sara and her husband Hayden a design mentoring session after the couple came last for the third consecutive week – the offer, while accepted, caused Sara to throw a bit of a tantrum.</p> <p>“There’s only so much as a human – any human – you’d be able to take,” Sara said of their negative feedback.</p> <p>Before meeting with Blaze, Sara said she was filled with “dread. Dread, dread, dread, dread, dread” as she prepared for her session with the experienced judge.</p> <p>While the interaction started off as civil, with Shaynna going through each room that had been previously judged and providing constructive criticism and tips, Sara was not appreciating the invaluable feedback.</p> <p>The tips, which included how to nail this week's Master Bedroom challenge, was something that the other contestants were envious of, as they would have loved to learn first-hand from the expert and mogul herself.</p> <p>But with Sara not being open to the critique, and Shaynna stepping foot inside the contestant's $75,000, last-placing bathroom, the interior designer’s patience started to wear thin.</p> <p>“But, I guess it’s all open for interpretation," said Hayden to the designer after hearing her feedback, causing tension amongst the three.</p> <p><em>Shaynna:</em> “What’s your career?”</p> <p><em>Hayden:</em> “Project manager in construction.”</p> <p><em>Shaynna:</em> “Right. And yours?”</p> <p><em>Sara:</em> “Flight attendant.”</p> <p><em>Shaynna:</em> “So how are you meant to know what <em>I’ve</em> done for 30 years? Just putting it out there. <em>That’s </em>why I’m here.”</p> <p>Shaynna then proceeded to advise the pair on different aspects of designing a master bedroom, touching on elements such as wall colourings, bedside tables, the lot.</p> <p>But Sara wasn’t having it.</p> <p>“It was … good advice. Whether or not she likes it is a whole other kettle of fish. I just can’t be bothered with high hopes again," said Shaynna.</p> <p>“I actually don’t know if they really listened. They think they’ve got the direction absolutely perfect.”</p> <p>Viewers at home took to Twitter to vent out their frustrations as many believed that the couple did not deserve to be mentored by the judge as they seemed less than grateful.</p> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en-gb"> <p dir="ltr">Sara woke with dread while every other contestant would have woken with excitement to get a 1:1 with Shaynna or Sheena as Sara likes to call her. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/9TheBlock?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#9TheBlock</a></p> — Nez (@fraggle73) <a href="https://twitter.com/fraggle73/status/1034377743620747266?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">28 August 2018</a></blockquote> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en-gb"> <p dir="ltr">Anyone would kill for this one on one time and hints from shaynna and yet Sara doesn’t care. She won’t take any of it on board, nothing will change <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/9TheBlock?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#9TheBlock</a></p> — Janelle Berner (@missnellebelle) <a href="https://twitter.com/missnellebelle/status/1034377503333277697?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">28 August 2018</a></blockquote> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en-gb"> <p dir="ltr">Think Courtney deserves the chat with Shaynna more than Sara. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/9TheBlock?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#9TheBlock</a></p> — Tarryn 💜 (@Taryabelle) <a href="https://twitter.com/Taryabelle/status/1034334947094351872?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">28 August 2018</a></blockquote> <p>What did you think of the heated moment between Shaynna, Sara and Hayden in last night's episode? Let us know in the comments below.</p>

TV

Placeholder Content Image

Dustin Hoffman's showdown with TV host over sexual harassment claims

<p>Dustin Hoffman got into a heated argument with TV host John Oliver during a public Q&amp;A session after Oliver grilled him about recent sexual harassment allegations made against him.</p> <p>Last month, <a href="http://www.oversixty.com.au/finance/legal/2017/11/dustin-hoffman-accused-of-sexually-harassing-teen-girl/" target="_blank"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Hoffman was accused</strong></span></a> by Anna Graham-Hunter of sexually harassing her when she was 17 years old in 1985 on the set of the TV movie <em>Death of a Salesman</em>.</p> <p>Referencing Hoffman’s apology to his former production assistant, Oliver asked, “You’ve made one statement in print — does that feel like enough to you?”</p> <p>“First of all, it didn’t happen, the way she reported,” the actor said, according to Deadline.</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><iframe src="https://www.facebook.com/plugins/video.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fwashingtonpost%2Fvideos%2F10157200623222293%2F&amp;show_text=0&amp;width=560" width="560" height="315" style="border: none; overflow: hidden;" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" allowfullscreen="true"></iframe></p> <p>Oliver replied, “It’s that part of the response to this stuff that pisses me off. It is reflective of who you were. You’ve given no evidence to show that it didn’t happen. There was a period of time when you were creeping around women. It feels like a cop-out to say, ‘Well, this isn’t me.’ Do you understand how that feels like a dismissal?”</p> <p>Hoffman responded, “You weren’t there.”</p> <p>“I’m glad,” Oliver said.</p> <p>The Q&amp;A was held during an event to commemorate the 20<sup>th</sup> anniversary of Hoffman’s film <em>Wag the Dog.</em></p> <p>According to <em>Deadline</em>, the panel lasted for roughly an hour and was filled with heated exchanges about the sexual harassment claims throughout.</p> <p>“You’ve put me on display here,” Hoffman told Oliver. “You have indicted me ... That’s not innocent until proven guilty.”</p> <p>Reportedly, Hoffman tried to blame the time period for his actions, saying the atmosphere was different when the alleged abuse occurred. However, Oliver did not take this excuse as a sufficient answer.</p> <p>“I don’t love that answer either,” the British comedian said.</p> <p>“What response do you want?” Hoffman asked.</p> <p>“It doesn’t feel self-reflective in the way it seems the incident demands,” replied Oliver. “I get no pleasure from this conversation,” he added. “But you and I are not the victims here.”</p> <p>Referencing the allegations made against him, Hoffman asked, “Do you believe this stuff you’re reading?”</p> <p>Oliver responded that he did believe the allegations “because she would have no reason to lie”.</p> <p>Shortly after a person in the crowd shouted, “Thank you for believing women.” </p>

Movies

Placeholder Content Image

Showdown: Jackie Lambie takes on Waleed Aly on The Project

<p>Tasmanian politician Jacqui Lambie appeared on <em>The Project</em> on Thursday, squaring off with host Waleed Aly, in a <a href="http://www.oversixty.com.au/news/news/2017/11/abc-boss-weighs-in-on-waleed-aly-rumours/" target="_blank"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>showdown that had viewers captivated</strong></span></a>.</p> <p>The one-time senator addressed a range of topics in the interview, where she admitted that she was “carrying a bit of baggage” but has been able to “move on”.</p> <p>The interview had all the makings of a feisty appearance with Lambie, a vocal critic of Islam, expected to throw down with Aly, who is a moderate Muslim.</p> <p>And for a moment, things looked dicey.</p> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"> <p dir="ltr">Former senator <a href="https://twitter.com/JacquiLambie?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JacquiLambie</a> reflects on the dual citizenship saga, her time in Parliament and if she’s returning to <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/auspol?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#auspol</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/TheProjectTV?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#TheProjectTV</a> <a href="https://t.co/peCx7iiUua">pic.twitter.com/peCx7iiUua</a></p> — The Project (@theprojecttv) <a href="https://twitter.com/theprojecttv/status/933617544757313538?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 23, 2017</a></blockquote> <p> “When you’d go off on things like the sharia stuff, you didn’t really know that stuff very well, but you had a really strong view about it,” Waleed said.</p> <p>“I wonder was that something that you look back on and think you could have done it better?”</p> <p>“I think it could have been done better,” Lambie hit back.</p> <p>“It could have been, knowing the topic. Knowledge is power, Waleed, as you’d know. You’re an academic. And the more you learn, the better off you’re going to be.</p> <p>“I might not (have) had a grasp three years ago. I have a clear grasp now. There is one law and one law only, that is Australian law.</p> <p>“Some will agree on this side and others won’t agree on this, that’s the truth of the matter. We can argue the point black and blue. Some will say it’s very moderate. That’s fine. No worries.</p> <p>“There are many out there that are concerned about sharia law and there’s no doubt about that.</p> <p>“If we make a better understanding, this country needs to learn there’s nothing wrong with bringing up a subject and putting it across the table and speaking about it, but respecting each other’s views and trying to get it out so we can sort it out.</p> <p>“I think this country has been really bad at that. I think we still, in this country, are sitting in the 1970s where they think if we can’t deal with it, we sweep it under the carpet.</p> <p>“If you don’t talk it out, you’ll never come up with the solutions that you need.”</p> <p>Aly was speaking in reference to an appearance Lambie made on Q&amp;A in Feburary this year, where Lambie has lashed out at Muslim activist Yassmin Abdel-Magied.</p> <p>“We have one law in this country and it is the Australian law. It is not sharia law, not in this country. Not in my day,” she had said, during the controversial appearance.</p> <p>What are your thoughts?</p>

News

Our Partners